- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:41:02 -0500
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <e2748ef1-29b9-3b4f-7606-f94dee671388@spellmanconsulting.com>
Text of minutes:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Silver Task Force Teleconference
23 Jan 2018
Attendees
Present
Jan, jaeunjemmaku, Jennison, Kelsey, Charles, Eleanor,
DavidMcNabb, jeanne, Shari
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
jeanne
Contents
* [2]Topics
1. [3]Researcher update
2. [4]Update and results from Eleanor Liacono research
3. [5]Other research
4. [6]San Diego face-to-face meeting invitation responses
5. [7]San Diego face-to-face meeting problem statements
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
Researcher update
Update and results from Eleanor Liacono research
Eleanor: My students formed interdisciplinary teams to work on
a problem on the intersection of society and technology. This
was an interactive qualifying products, they started in
September to finish in December.
... you will see this in the report I sent you in the
Reflections
... they have to write a 100 page report on the problem
... they set up the survey and then interviews
... I'll go through the main questions from the survey and the
interviews
... They sent out surveys. 39 usable surveys were returned
... one question was about familiarity with accessibility
guidelines were they could pick multiple guidelines. Majority
were none, then ADA, then WCAG (5). No one had heard of 508.
... the question list of disabilities of what they knew someone
personally. 22 knew someone with depression or other mental
health issue, then learning disability, then blind, then
hearing. [Scribe couldn't keep up with the numbers]
... Those results make sense based on working in a college
population
... participants expose to web accessibility: 22 said moderate
amount, 2 said none, 2 said a great deal.
... participants discussion in their courses. 15 said No, 19
said yes, ?? said don't know
... there is a mix of graduates and undergraduates, so there
was some comparison of the groups.
... the gender distribution was 26 males and 11 females
... majors were computers science (15), ?? Others (6)
... where did people learn about web accessibility? 42 had not
discussed in class. So most had learned about it through
project work.
... coverage of web accessibility but they didn't feel
confident that they had the knowledge they needed to do it.
... when asked about people they know that need web
accessibility, many said parents or grandparents. One said that
they needed an international website that had to apply
accessibility in a different language.
... if they knew someone with a disability, they were more
likely to know more about accessibility
... if your boss didn't know about web accessibility, how would
you react, and what would you do? They would try to educate the
boss, and if not, they would try to keep accessibility in mind.
... some gave examples of how they could include web
accessibiltiy
... some suggested that 1-2 of the 14 sessions be devoted to
web accessbility
... a caveat about the grad vs. undergrad, there is a class the
graduates attend on UX. Also grads tend to be more
international.
... it would be interesting to see from their perspective, what
they are coming with and what they need to learn about web
accessibility.
Shawn: 22 said they had a moderate exposure to web
accessibility, but it seems like a bigger gap between who knew
about accessibility guidelines
Eleanor: I think they have learned more about techniques than
the guiding principles
Charles: If 27 had no experience with laws or guidelines, they
know the generalities but not the specifics.
Eleanor: Having the knowledge about it, doesn't say how to
include it in specific work
Kelsey: How did you get started on this accessibility force?
What was the driving force?
Eleanor: A friend of mine teaches at Harvard, and I was doing
guest lectures. They were always saying that accessibility is
difficult, it was too hard to do. I became interested in how
education would change perceptions. So this survey that an way
to look at the first step of determining where they are.
Kelsey: And did the students interview students?
Eleanor: Yes they did. We are in the process of transcribing
the meetings. It took longer to get the interview numbers they
wanted. It was important learning. If we were going to do it
again, it would go faster.
Jennison: Were they incentivized?
Eleanor: Yes, people that completed the interview got an Amazon
gift card for $5.
Charles: Could we get the link to the report?
Eleanor: The student report was 97 pages long and is published
at WPI. I sent it to Jemma
Jennison: I encourage you to put this work in the public
domain\
Jemma: I would like to see the data in detail
... there is an education and outreach group in W3C and they
may be interested
... I would like permission to share the report
Jennison: There is a group, Teach Access, that works on
curricula on accessibility.
Eleanor: I have no problem with sharing the report, but I am
not ready to have it be shared publicly.
... it is a great example of the work that WPI students do.
... This is a natural fit with WPI and how technology can
impact society in a positive way. I would be interested in
other work that we could partner with you.
Jeanne: I hope we can share it privately so we can see the
data, but we will not share it publicly until it is ready and
we have permission.
Eleanor: This is a good collaboration
Kelsey??: I think it important to educate people early on
accessibility
Other research
<Kelsey_> (yes that was me)
Shawn: Dave Sloan sent a detailed email with info on research
... Mike Crabb sent 9 papers that students worked on, each took
a Silver research question. 50 students worked on this. The 9
papers he sent were the top grades of the class.
<Kelsey_> Could someone send a link to the folder?
Charles: Last week I took an action to look for someone to take
over the conformance survey task.
... Kelsey volunteered to so the Conformance Survey to complete
it.
Jemma: The email from David also says he would be happy to work
with Kelsey to finish the survey.
Jeanne: Jeanne and Kelsey will talk this week and pull all the
info together so Kelsey can finish the survey.
Shari: I have reached out to Klaus and Michael Heron, but
haven't heard back.
... I started the work on the data analysis for Pete McNally. I
will have a draft for Friday.
<Kelsey_> Jeanne, thank you for sharing the folder. Could
someone grant me the access to view it? I have access to Design
Sprint docs but this this folder.
<Kelsey_> *not this folder
<jemma> rrsagengt, make minutes
San Diego face-to-face meeting invitation responses
Jennison: I would like to get an update.
Shawn: I have not been able to get an update from emails since
vacation. Currently we have 15 confirmed responses.
... we have invited a few people with UX experience, but we
have not had responses
Jennison: I have an alternative who works on accessibility team
for Royal National Bank of Canada and has a masters in UX.
Shawn: We have two people in wave one who has been invited.
Whitney was invited in December but hasn't responded.
Kelsey: I would be interested in joining.
Shawn: We need to get more invites out. I have a number of
invites to send out. It won't happen today, but I will have
time tomorrow morning to get them out.
<shari> +shari
Jennison: While we are aiming for 30, 20 may be more
manageable, if they are diverse.
San Diego face-to-face meeting problem statements
<Jan> Hey Guys - I have to jump on another call - thanks for
all of the great work!!
Charles: I made some updates. I also wrote all three sections
for maintenance. In the Usability problem statement, I noted
where there was convergence from the problem.
... Please read the Maintenance problem issues before Friday
Topics: Regrets
Jennison: Regrets for Friday. I am traveling.
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 15:41:30 UTC