- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 15:17:14 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Formatted version of minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2018/04/20-silver-minutes.html
Text version of minutes:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Silver Task Force Teleconference
20 Apr 2018
Attendees
Present
Jan, Lauriat, MichaelC_, Luis_Garcia, kirkwood, JohnM,
shari, Jennison, jeanne, LuisGarcia, Charles,
JaeunJemmaku
Regrets
Jan
Chair
Jeanne, Shawn
Scribe
jeanne
Contents
* [2]Topics
1. [3]AccessU meeting scheduled
2. [4]Finalizing the Design Sprint Report (someone sort
the HMW?)
3. [5]Standards for naming and tagging (user test at
AccessU?)
4. [6]Requirements document
5. [7]Plain Language Next Steps
6. [8]F2F meeting at TPAC in October?
* [9]Summary of Action Items
* [10]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
AccessU meeting scheduled
jeanne: We are scheduled at AccessU on the 15th.
... it will be a drop in meeting for anyone who wants to check
on the work and contribute to the prototype.
... We will make posteSilverrs about
Finalizing the Design Sprint Report (someone sort the HMW?)
[11]https://www.w3.org/community/silver/draft-final-report-of-s
ilver/
[11] https://www.w3.org/community/silver/draft-final-report-of-silver/
Standards for naming and tagging (user test at AccessU?)
Charles: I think the Information ARchitecture and the Naming
and Tagging should be merged, because there is a great deal of
overlap. How to we come up with names so we can "datbase eall
the things" approach that will allow us to display information
more effectively.
... I see these two as part of one large project
... I think we are all agreed that we should invite s ome
others
... I have talked with Peter Morville who is an expert in IA.
He is willing to help us raise awareness and host a guest on
his podcast, and do introductions
... he suggested I reach out to ?? and ??? to look for some
young students who would be willing to do more work as a resume
building activity. They are trained by experts.
... I will take steps to organize work spaces to organize that
participation.
Jeanne: We also need to involve W3C Systeam.
Jennison: Can we do one without the other?
Charles: In order to test sometehing, we have to have something
to test. There are tools that allow users to order things that
makes sense to them.
... we would want to run an open card sort at AccessU. Where
they name the categories
... and a close card sort where we give them items and they
sort them into categories.
Jeanne: we don't have to do it at AccessU, it's a very short
time frame
Charles: These are online tools, so we can just socialize the
link.
<LuisGarcia> Jeanne: publicity about Silver will help ability
to recruit. Even that interview is a good starting point
<LuisGarcia> .. Could also do scaled down "just
recommendations" and socialize that, so people don't need to
worry about a 22 page paper
Charles: we should use the AccessU as a recruiting tool to get
people involved in Silver ror proptypes
<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne with Charles will set up a place for
people to work on the Information architecture
<trackbot> Created ACTION-171 - With charles will set up a
place for people to work on the information architecture [on
Jeanne F Spellman - due 2018-04-27].
Requirements document
Shawn: We need to look through the examples and decide what we
want to put into it an how.
<Charles> once the outline is established, I can contribute to
the requirements document
Shawn: I think I can work on a early first draft. I can have a
drftt ready for Friday meeting.
<scribe> ACTION: Shawn to write aerly draft of Requirements
outline
<trackbot> Created ACTION-172 - Write aerly draft of
requirements outline [on Shawn Lauriat - due 2018-04-27].
Plain Language Next Steps
Jeanne: What is the next thing we need to do for Plain
Language?
Charles: We have the sample from John Rochford with the
principles he used to create them.
... we need to look at the sample of John Rochford's video and
decide whether or not that is the direction we want to pursue
... I added a page with all the resources I sent on simple
language
... there is an ISO standard for how to write standards in
plain language
Shari: The ISO standard is different from the Federal
requirements for plain language in response to the Plain
Language Act.
<Charles> list of resources are in this doc:
[12]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LPMbnOGKS4B6LIQ3_vQ0NFK
K7LYUgM3TO7nCc7OOacs/edit?usp=sharing
[12]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LPMbnOGKS4B6LIQ3_vQ0NFKK7LYUgM3TO7nCc7OOacs/edit?usp=sharing
Jeanne: Do we know if people in COGA have objections to the
existing the standards?
Shari: All the COGA documents refere to the Federal documents
for the Plain Language Act of 2010.
JohnK: That has been discussed quite a bit in COGA, and that is
what the group has concensus on in the COGA TF.
Shari: COGA TF also requests that all the material be written
in upper primary level.
Jeanne: I think that we can do that for a lot of areas in
Silver. We may have to go more technical in developer pages.
Charles: That's the importance of the style guides, when
something falls out of that range, we have a plan of how to
handle it.
F2F meeting at TPAC in October?
jeanne: We have the opportunity to meet there.
... you can attend remotely.
SHari: no
Jennison: No
<JohnM> no
Jan: Yes
<kirkwood> probably
Shawn: Yes
Jeanne: probably
Charles: If funding allows.
Jeanne: we will discuss more on Tuesday. I'll send out a
survey.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne with Charles will set up a place for
people to work on the Information architecture
[NEW] ACTION: Shawn to write aerly draft of Requirements
outline
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Received on Friday, 20 April 2018 19:17:42 UTC