- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:45:49 -0400
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
Formatted Minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html
Text of Minutes
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Silver Task Force Teleconference
26 Sep 2017
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-irc
Attendees
Present
jeanne, Shawn, Jennison, Jemma, Jan
Regrets
Chair
Shawn, Jeanne
Scribe
jeanne
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Task Force driven research: interviews, analysis,
etc.
2. [5]Interviews
3. [6]Research project updates
4. [7]CSUN submission
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
Task Force driven research: interviews, analysis, etc.
Interviews
[10]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N0tvIX1zWiNSKSmC2xYwsnF
wCzgTGguj0_rADK7boRY/edit
[10]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N0tvIX1zWiNSKSmC2xYwsnFwCzgTGguj0_rADK7boRY/edit
<scribe> scribe: jeanne
Shawn: the target research questions are helpful for follow up
and making sure that the conversation stays focused.
... I will contact Loretta for the pilot.
... I will send her the questions in advance
Jennison: I strongly suggest you record it.
... you can tell them that you will destroy the recording after
you take notes.
Jeanne: I don't think we should automatically destroy it. If
the person being interviewed insists, then we could, but I
don't want to automatically destroy information.
Jennison: We need to figure out how to handle interview data
and attribution.
Jemma: That's correct, in an academic environment we have to
get ethics board approval for our policies of privacy,
attribution, and publication.
Jennison: We have to take a stance that what we are doing. We
have to be consistent. We have to be explicit and transparent
of what we are going to do.
Jemma: There are guidelines in academia. The interviewee has to
be informed in advance.
Jeanne: I think that what we do has to be in the public record,
for reasons of transparency. I'm ok with with correcting the
record, but we shouldn't have secret interviews.
Michael: We don't want there to be claims of opinions that
aren't verifiable. Normally, we offer attribution to credit
people, but if people don't want the credit, because I think is
not a problem.
Jemma: If I want to join the research as a member of
UofIllinois without having IRB review for human subject
participation.
... (IRB, Institutional Review Board). If I participate in the
Interview or Survey projects, I have to have permission from my
IRB.
Shawn: It's ok that you aren't involved, since you have a lot
of work on the Literature Review.
<jemma>
[11]https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/forms-templates/template
s
[11] https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/forms-templates/templates
Michael: I don't want a 3 month delay for IRB review, but we
should be careful to follow protocols for working with human
subjects.
... The Research Questions Task Force could help. It would be
best to work with David Sloan.
Jemma: There is an online training that we have to go through.
It protects the interviewee. It takes a little time but it is
doable.
<jemma> [12]https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/
[12] https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/
<jemma>
[13]https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checkli
sts
[13] https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checklists
<jemma>
[14]https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checkli
sts/review-types#AExemptReview
[14]
https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checklists/review-types#AExemptReview
<jemma>
[15]https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checkli
sts/review-types#AExpeditedReview
[15]
https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checklists/review-types#AExpeditedReview
<jemma>
[16]https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checkli
sts/collaborating-research
[16]
https://oprs.research.illinois.edu/review-processes-checklists/collaborating-research
<jemma>
[17]https://couhes.mit.edu/training-research-involving-human-su
bjects
[17] https://couhes.mit.edu/training-research-involving-human-subjects
<scribe> ACTION: Jemma to talk with her contact at IRB about
what is needed to conduct research. [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action01]
[18] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action01
<trackbot> Created ACTION-123 - Talk with her contact at irb
about what is needed to conduct research. [on JaEun Ku - due
2017-10-03].
<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne to (with Jennison) to read through the
IRB information [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action02]
[19] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action02
<trackbot> Created ACTION-124 - (with jennison) to read through
the irb information [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2017-10-03].
<scribe> ACTION: Jan to (with Sheri) to investigate the IRB
requirements and give a recommendation. [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action03]
[20] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action03
<trackbot> Created ACTION-125 - (with sheri) to investigate the
irb requirements and give a recommendation. [on Jan McSorley -
due 2017-10-03].
Research project updates
Jan: I talked with Tyson last week. He has a list of questions
to ask at the staff and students at the Community College
Level.
... Read and respond to the email I sent with the questions.
... I have a meeting with him in two weeks.
... are there other questions we want him to ask?
... Klaus has been busy with travel and the college. He hasn't
been able to find a time to meet about the CSUN special journal
idea, and wants to exchange ideas by email.
... I want to Shawn and Jeanne to propose to Klaus what we want
to do. We need to think through that.
... he will need to get permission from CSUN to do it.
... I haven't heard back from Nancy. Michael Heron and I
meeting this week.
... Michael wants to do a diary study with students with a
course requirement.
Jeanne: I think we need to have a meeting to discuss Klaus'
proposal. I don't know enough about his idea to be able to
write a proposal of what we want.
[scheduled]
Jemma: How do you want us to respond to Tyson?
Jan: Please respond to the email with your comments inline.
Jennison: Is there an urgency to publish this year? Could we
publish next year (2019)?
Jan: I think there is no urgency. Klaus is trying to be helpful
in getting the word out.
CSUN submission
<jemma>
[21]https://docs.google.com/document/d/15f0AklBmGT4UmH7uzWgvoMW
alLKv7zQhvAqqWx_kOTw/edit
[21]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15f0AklBmGT4UmH7uzWgvoMWalLKv7zQhvAqqWx_kOTw/edit
Shawn: Pete McNally will join us Friday to talk abot Survey
Results.
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Jan to (with Sheri) to investigate the IRB
requirements and give a recommendation. [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to (with Jennison) to read through the IRB
information [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Jemma to talk with her contact at IRB about what
is needed to conduct research. [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action01]
[22] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action03
[23] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action02
[24] http://www.w3.org/2017/09/26-silver-minutes.html#action01
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
__________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 29 September 2017 17:46:18 UTC