Re: Regrets and update

Dave,

That sounds great, thank you! Discussed during today's call and all agreed
that it sounds very helpful.

-Shawn

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:22 AM, David Sloan <dsloan@paciellogroup.com>
wrote:

> Regrets for today’s call, due to competing work requirements.
>
> I’ve been thinking how to move the survey authoring process forward, and
> would like to propose moving the candidate questions for conformance into a
> spreadsheet, where we can list candidate questions, and audiences we’d like
> to ask.
>
> That way, we can decide for each question, whether it should be included
> in a survey on the specific subject we’re trying to learn more about and/or
> whether it should be included in a survey targeted at a specific
> stakeholder group.
>
> It will also help us understand how best to ask a question, given
> potentially competing demands on gathering meaningful data and effort
> required to analyse the data.
>
> if this process works, we can use it for other surveys, if we think we’ll
> have time and capacity to run them.
>
> If that sounds agreeable, I’ll go ahead and produce something for the
> conformance survey questions, and share with you all to discuss next week.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
> David Sloan
> --
> UX Research Lead
> The Paciello Group
> https://www.paciellogroup.com
> A VFO™ Company http://www.vfo-group.com/
>
> Inclusive Design 24, November 16th 2017
> https://www.inclusivedesign24.org
> --
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us
> immediately.
> Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be
> taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited
> and may be unlawful.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>