- From: Sarah Horton <shorton@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 11:13:01 -0400
- To: Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <DFB86093-3224-4111-AE11-457998B1A249@paciellogroup.com>
http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html <http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html>
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Silver Task Force Teleconference
02 Jun 2017
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-irc
Attendees
Present
sloandr, SarahHorton, Lauriat, jeanne, Shawn, Jan,
Jennison
Regrets
Jemma
Chair
Shawn
Scribe
Sarah
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Research project sheet review
2. [5]Silver budget needs
3. [6]What can we learn from WCAG 2.1 rollout
4. [7]Individual Silver team members research projects
5. [8]Action item review
6. [9]What goes in the Toolkit as part of the Action Item
Review
* [10]Summary of Action Items
* [11]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 02 June 2017
Research project sheet review
<scribe> Scribe: Sarah
<sloandr> Lowell Reade is interested in WCAG adaptations. We
could use this as a case study of one organisation that created
an adapted version, and a template for other similar
investigations
Jan: Has contact of researcher who is looking at WCAG
adaptations
... Will share with Dave
Sarah: Stanley starting this summer
... Pete will provide an update before next meeting
Jeanne: What is status of core questions
Sarah: Need signoff
Dave: Will share with RQTF
... Will ask for feedback by early next week
... Will ask them to respond by Wednesday
Jeanne: Let's sign off questions by next Friday
Core research questions:
[12]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf
92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/edit
[12] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vDzSCO-mEnPB7jaAzIhOOLf92b0pCuzzR8u_GSWTw_M/edit
Sarah: Dave Swallow, question about recruitment/compensation
and core questions
Jeanne: Will work on getting a budget, needs itemized list of
what we need
... What would you need, prioritized
... Think about it as mini-grant, let's have meeting and figure
out what we want, or send email
Jennison: Looking at tokens of appreciation for help, determine
how many participants across research studies, arrive at total
amount
... Diary studies will likely require incentive
Dave: Incentives that are guaranteed, incentives that are
offered as reward
Jennison: Incentives do drive participation
Jeanne: What else do we need?
Jan: Funds to help with meeting before CSUN
Dave: Funding specific things, participation, meetings
Jeanne: Meeting before CSUN will be after research, analysis,
from there have meeting to develop prototypes
Jennison: Also consider accommodations for meetings
Jeanne: Can start with this, will reach out for more details as
needed
Jennison: Is anyone looking into impact of WCAG 2.1 on Silver?
... Lessons learned from 2.1 rollout, what worked, what didn't?
Shawn: Some things looking at that directly and indirectly
... Will be talking to working group participants
Jeanne: Could we add to research questions?
Shawn: There are a few questions where it's implied
Jeanne: How about adding a question, What might we learn from
the rollout of WCAG 2.1?
Jennison: Also ask question in end-user community, people who
are in companies that need to apply the guidelines
Jeanne: Good to look at communication around implications of
new guidelines
... How would you design a rollout, document ideas, build a
plan
<Lauriat> I've added "What can we learn from the WCAG 2.1
process and rollout?" to the research questions page:
[13]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_
Projects#Proposed_Research_Questions
[13] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_Projects#Proposed_Research_Questions
Silver budget needs
What can we learn from WCAG 2.1 rollout
Individual Silver team members research projects
<jeanne> Sarah: I think we should look at what we are doing
individually on the team to support the research questions.
<jeanne> Shawn: Jeanne and I have been very busy this spring,
but this summer things should calm down. I want to work on
individual research questions.
<jeanne> Sarah: I think we should take Jennison's idea of
addressing the Silver rollout as a project
<jeanne> Jan: I want to look at how we can onboard more people
to participate in Silver -- simplifying the Stakeholder form
<jeanne> ... I am meeting with Jeanne on Wednesday to talk
about Stakeholder onboarding and communication.
<jeanne> Sarah: We need to have a way to take ideas and move
forward with them with more participation.
<jeanne> ... even if it is just a Google folder that we put
ideas in that others can contribute to.
<jeanne> ... we have talked about Foundational things that we
have talked about we need to do the work. Like the Core
Questions. When we get these in place, we can use the shared
toolkit and head in the same direction.
Jeanne: Had list of people who wanted to contribute, another
part of toolkit is communicating to and enroll new people in
doing work
Sarah: We were going to do an additional outreach to
stakeholders, were going to offer an option to opt in
Jeanne: Were going to ask their permission to share their
information with researchers
... Letter is drafted, need opt-in form
Sarah: Maybe we should have discussion about what are things
that need to be in toolkit
Shawn: Going through action items and poll for research
question prioritization
... Put all questions in poll and ask which are priorities for
Silver development
... Want to make clear as possible that we are asking what is
important for Silver
... Question, options are not directly related to development
of silver, middle option, essential for development of Silver
Jennison: Midpoint might be may or may not be
Jeanne: How about useful but not essential
Shawn: Not having required responses
... Concerned about people who don't have an opinion
Jennison: What about making that a choice
Shawn: Not directly related, Essential, and I don't have an
opinion
... Will make them all required
... Will present options in random order so there's not implied
prioritization
... Will send email to task force once draft is ready
Action item review
[14]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/
open
[14] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
What goes in the Toolkit as part of the Action Item Review
<jeanne>
[15]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/
open
[15] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/actions/open
<jeanne> action-89 due 9 June
<trackbot> Set action-89 - prepare to share bonus survey with
tf due date to 2017-06-09.
<jeanne> close action-86
<trackbot> Closed action-86.
<jeanne> Sarah - Communication with Stakeholders -- that is
holding up the diary studies
<jeanne> ... Stakeholders are a tool in the toolkit
<jeanne> ... Budget will help Dave Swallow move forward in his
study. Incentives will help with any study
<jeanne> ... onboarding for researchers - organizing all the
docs that researchers need for us.
<jeanne> ... onboarding for new participants
<jeanne> ... the Core research questions
<jeanne> ... the Copyright policy
<jeanne> ... policy for using the stakeholder list
<jeanne> action-25 due 21 July
<trackbot> Set action-25 Will reeach out to w3c members who
informally committed resources to silver tf. due date to
2017-07-21.
<jeanne> Sarah: Invite people to take ownership of the
different parts of the toolkit and work on them with others, so
they move forward.
<jeanne> ... other activities are dependent on them.
Sarah: Three buckets, Stakeholders, Budget, and Onboarding
Jeanne: Researcher Onboarding and Community Onboarding
Sarah: I will own Researcher Onboarding budget
Jeanne: Setting up the Google form and sending out update to
stakeholders
Jennison: Should stakeholder communications come from
co-chairs?
Sarah: Jeanne is owning Budget
Jennison: Will coordinate Community Engagement
Shawn: Will own Stakeholders
Jennison: Nov 9 event, heard back from venues, they have room
that will hold 50 people
... Would want to make sure attendance is open to community
Shawn: Keep communications casual
Jennison: First half hour mix/mingle, will turn over to
Shawn/Jeanne to facilitate
<scribe> ACTION: Jennison to continue work on arranging Nov 9
meetup [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html#action01]
[16] http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html#action01
<trackbot> Error finding 'Jennison'. You can review and
register nicknames at
<[17]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/users>.
[17] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/users
Jennison: Meeting from 6:30 to 9, start up at 7
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Jennison to continue work on arranging Nov 9
meetup [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html#action01]
[18] http://www.w3.org/2017/06/02-silver-minutes.html#action01
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Sarah Horton
User Experience Strategy Lead
The Paciello Group
www.paciellogroup.com
A VFO™ Company
www.vfo-group.com
603 252-6052 mobile
This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Friday, 2 June 2017 15:13:33 UTC