W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-silver@w3.org > January 2017

Re: Request for agenda item on project planning and operating model

From: Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:39:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGQw2hk_rfDHQXvQXKrNsP4F12+waGHHKMbCp3=Hoxtvy-0Caw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sarah Horton <shorton@paciellogroup.com>
Cc: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>

Added! Definitely want to make sure to keep us all on the same page.
Looking forward to chatting tomorrow morning.



On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Sarah Horton <shorton@paciellogroup.com>

> Silver team, I would like to see “project planning and taskforce operating
> model” as an item on our agenda for Tuesday.
> When working on the Silver Design Plan [1] my expectation was that we
> would treat Silver as a product development project, with tasks and
> milestones. I expected a collaborative operating model, with taskforce
> members and partners having clear roles and responsibilities for different
> tasks and milestones. In other words, we would create Silver as a product,
> following a product development methodology, with project planning and a
> product development team.
> My impression so far is that we are following a more standard working
> group model, with some long-term planning, tasks (actions) defined and
> assigned at weekly meetings, and minimal delegation of responsibilities
> among task force members and partners.
> If we continue to use the current project planning and operating model I
> am concerned that we may have chosen the wrong process to follow for
> Silver. A design-driven process with multiple activities and lots of
> collaboration needs detailed planning and a coordinated team
> effort—especially one like Silver, that does not have a dedicated product
> development team.
> I raised the topic of “roles and responsibilities” several times at our
> face-to-face meeting, but my impression is that my concerns are not shared
> with others on the taskforce. I was reassured that the process might be
> different from what I was accustomed to as someone relatively new to W3C
> activities, but that it would be effective in making progress.
> As someone who was closely involved with creating the Silver Design Plan,
> I wanted to be sure those involved and affected are aware that I am not
> confident we can achieve the objectives of the Silver Design Plan without a
> plan and operating model that looks more like one used in product
> development. I believe we can make progress with the current operating
> model, but we might want to revisit the plan and scale back on some of the
> activities if we continue using this model.
> Thanks,
> Sarah
> [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/
> Design_Plan_for_Silver
> Sarah Horton
> UX Strategy Lead
> The Paciello Group
> 603 252-6052 mobile
> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us
> immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or
> omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message
> is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Monday, 9 January 2017 22:39:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:23:49 UTC