Minutes of the Silver Subgroup Teleconference of 25 Aug 2017

https://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                    Silver Task Force Teleconference

25 Aug 2017

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-irc

Attendees

   Present
          SarahHorton, Jan, Jeanne, Dave, Shawn, sloandr, Jennison

   Regrets
   Chair
          Shawn

   Scribe
          Sarah

Contents

     * [3]Topics
     * [4]Summary of Action Items
     * [5]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <sloandr> I'd like to propose we talk about a plan for
   surveying other stakeholders

   <scribe> scribe: Sarah

   Jeanne: follow-up on diary participants, heard from Andrew Arch
   who expects to have a participant
   ... Jemma is reaching out to someone in Korea
   ... Has not heard back from contact in Japan

   <scribe> ACTION: Jeanne to contact more people in Japan to
   recruit people for diary study [recorded in
   [6]http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action01]

      [6] http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action01

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-116 - Contact more people in japan to
   recruit people for diary study [on Jeanne F Spellman - due
   2017-09-01].

   Jennison: Do we have an update on compensation

   Jeanne: No guarantee, will reach out to contact

   <scribe> ACTION: Jeanne to contact Amazon for gift card
   compensation for diary study [recorded in
   [7]http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action02]

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action02

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-117 - Contact amazon for gift card
   compensation for diary study [on Jeanne F Spellman - due
   2017-09-01].

   Jeanne: Reminder that Dave Swallow would like to start study
   Sept 1

   Jennison: Assuming he will start the following week

   Jeanne: Has drafted proposal for three interview projects, on
   Google Drive

   Dave: Has put thoughts into Google Drive in surveys subfolder
   ... Have survey of UX professionals
   ... Have standard demographic questions
   ... Have other questions about usability of SCs
   ... We have translation support
   ... We have a big list of names of stakeholders
   ... Used that list as basis for determining stakeholder groups
   ... Reads out list of stakeholder groups, could become list of
   people we could survey
   ... Also listed research questions that could be explored using
   surveys
   ... Reviewed next steps
   ... 1 Prioritise stakeholder groups to survey
   ... 2 Populate the question bank with questions that could be
   asked of more than one stakeholder group
   ... 3 Write stakeholder-specific questions
   ... 4 Identify distribution plan
   ... 5 QA survey
   ... 6 Create Translated version
   ... 7 Launch survey
   ... 8 Analysis
   ... Finally, log survey design and progress
   ... Purpose was to gather thoughts and start a conversation
   within group about approach

   Shawn: Within next steps, add step 0 and have that be to
   prioritize and group questions
   ... Some stakeholder groups will be better suited to answering
   specific questions
   ... Provides context for prioritizing stakeholder groups

   Jennison: Other groups that guidelines aren't reaching, like
   mobile app developers and designers
   ... All the other stuff that's future thinking for all the
   people who don't access web guidelines
   ... Accessibility professionals, broad group that includes
   designers and developers that do accessibility?

   Dave: Overlap, will have people who fall into multiple groups
   ... Do we survey people who do development and don't mention
   accessibility until you're into survey or
   ... Do we reach out to people who do accessibility, not sure

   Jennison: What about reaching out to people the guidelines
   aren't currently reaching

   Shawn: When we created stakeholder map we made sure it included
   people who weren't web focused
   ... Tried to make it generic to cover technologies and people
   who are left out because of narrow focus on web content

   Jennison: Do you feel we have that representation? Or do we
   need to recruit more people from non-web

   Shawn: We have a few indentified but more outreach would be
   beneficial

   Jennison: Make sure we have at least one activity that is
   directed to non-web development/design

   Shawn: Yes, developer could be mobile, VR, native application
   ... Talk through prioritization of research questions?

   Dave: Will edit doc as we discuss

   Group reviews questions in list and sets priority levels

   Dave: Based in ranking exercise, can identify stakeholder
   groups to target for priority questions

   <Lauriat> Stakeholder map:
   [8]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/128vPnCweXN9t4JBG7-AO
   eBhT-KquaWXcCsi3H-f8u94/preview

      [8] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/128vPnCweXN9t4JBG7-AOeBhT-KquaWXcCsi3H-f8u94/preview

   Shawn: Brainstormed roles related to accessibility
   ... Tried to keep it granular to be helpful but not too many
   roles
   ... Identified interactions with accessibility guidelines for
   each role
   ... E.g., making policy has lots of roles with partial
   applicability
   ... Thinking for map was that we are getting ready for
   research, use to identify stakeholder groups for research
   ... Names on stakeholder list mapped to stakeholder map roles
   ... One column, action, indicates which roles need expanded
   representation
   ... E.g., disability organization coverage

   Dave: Will be useful for drawing up distribution plan for
   surveys

   Jan: Reminder that Scott Hollier has volunteered to help
   distribute surveys

   Jennison: What about WCAG survey work, still needs to review
   survey

   Sarah: Would like to list A and AA only on survey

   Jennison: AAA not as widely known

   Dave: Could AAAs come as a bonus part at the end?

   Shawn: Agree about removing AAAs

   Sarah: Will remove and then Jennison can review the survey

   Group reviews stakeholder map roles and priority research
   questions

   Dave: Exercise raises question of how to pursue research
   questions
   ... Can ask anyone who has something to say on a topic to reply
   ... Can ask survey questions designed to a specific stakeholder
   group
   ... Will get people who might not have be interested/aware
   about a research question
   ... Could do both

   Shawn: As we progress through steps we will see patterns and
   structure surveys accordingly

   Dave: Can do same exercise for other high-priority research
   questions and reconvene next week
   ... Will aim to have ready for Tuesday call

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to contact Amazon for gift card
   compensation for diary study [recorded in
   [9]http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action02]
   [NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to contact more people in Japan to recruit
   people for diary study [recorded in
   [10]http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action01]

      [9] http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action02
     [10] http://www.w3.org/2017/08/25-silver-minutes.html#action01

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]
Sarah Horton
User Experience Strategy Lead
The Paciello Group
www.paciellogroup.com
A VFO™ Company 
www.vfo-group.com
603 252-6052 mobile

This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.