- From: Ku, Ja Eun <jku@illinois.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 15:06:34 +0000
- To: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>, Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5AB52E1B-910D-4ACB-885F-127414E18B67@illinois.edu>
Formatted version of the minutes in HTML: https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html JaEun Jemma Ku, PhD Internet Applications Systems Specialist University library University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 424 Library, M/C 522 1408 West Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801 1-217-244-2145 jku@illinois.edu<mailto:jku@illinois.edu> https://publish.illinois.edu/a11yfirst/ https://github.com/a11yfirst ----------------------------------------- Silver Task Force Teleconference 14 Apr 2017 See also: IRC log<http://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-irc> Attendees Present sarah, jeanne, jemma, Jennison Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe jemma Contents * Topics<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#agenda> * research checkin<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#item01> * Survey questions<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#item02> * email draft to Stakeholders<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#item03> * Meeting at TPAC?<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#item04> * Summary of Action Items<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#ActionSummary> * Summary of Resolutions<https://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary> ________________________________ <jeanne> asynchronously? I can scribe <jeanne> scribe: jemma research checkin can you hear me? regret+ shawn, sukil, jan regret+ david <SarahHorton> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Bsqv595CnSzmUa2Tv53duudNvn_ExTW6xGx-6_ECM7c/edit#gid=55201506 sarah is in touch base with stanley one of research partners msu members are meeting this week to discuss the survey about current status of WCAG support for the people no update for Eleanor till IRB is done MSU is also working on IRB approval process Sukil's update is done this tuesday david swallow has a proposal dave is composing diary study initially he thought about long term study with users but decided on more short term and more number of diary studies reporting of user experience of accessibility guidelines diary studies will be useful for this purpose his deliverable will be qualitative and quantitive report The first diary study will begin in May 2017. Jeanne: TF's research compensation support? ... sarah, can you help with this? sarah: David will be the better person to do this with his expereince <jeanne> ACTION: Jeanne to talk with Dave to draw up a budget to support research - particularly self-reporting studies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-81 - Talk with dave to draw up a budget to support research - particularly self-reporting studies. [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2017-04-21]. jemma: no update for the researcher in Japan yet jeanne: we may need to work more on asynchronous way there can be challenges in terms of language and time zone to work synchonosly Survey questions preview for online survey by Peter McNally discussing the survey questionnaire by Peter McNally - interested in UX designer's experience designed using Qualtrics sarah: he has pretty to in depth questions ... he is trying to figure out which in depth questions can be done in survey or in depth interviews Jennison: accessibility of third party survey tool tends to be good but some of keyboard may not work. qualitrics would work well including survey monkey sarah: Pete's questions include "How well does the current structure of W3C Accessibility Guidelines support learning and remembering key principles of web accessibility?" which is pretty good also ask whether respondents are interested in 30-45 minute phone interview during May or June 2017 Pete is planning to attend Silver TF meeting coming Tuesday TF members can look at the survey and talk about it at the meeting. email draft to Stakeholders jeanne: background of this email is from the regular meeting with michale cooper michale suggested to set up new form asking stakeholders to clarify their roles to connect them to research partners jeanne: we also want to engage stakeholders and invite them to be part of community group and give updated info about the project progress and be part of research projects that is the background of this email sarah: survey isn't created yet, is it? jeanne: no. I am thinking about the design - how I can put multiple stakeholders in the survey form Sarah: stakeholder grouping may be misleading in the form sarah: I would list stakeholder roles but refrain grouping of stakeholders using header jennison: sometimes heading is helpful for accessibility but I get Sarah's points for 31 stakeholder roles being grouped by categories jeanne: we mapped stakeholders with their roles and actions <jeanne> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/128vPnCweXN9t4JBG7-AOeBhT-KquaWXcCsi3H-f8u94/edit#gid=0 role are by Action Consult Make Policy Use Policy Make Content Teach Research Make Standards Make decisions Help people with disabilities Beneficiary of standards Communicate Measure/test jeanne: we would like to capture both official title(ex: developer) and formal/informal responsibility in the role we have 31 roles for now jennison: in terms of sorting perspective,action based role may be easier for researchers. Meeting at TPAC? <jeanne> https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/ tpac is annual meeting for working group we can do formal and informal meetings monday, tuesday and thursday are reserved for workgroup meetings wednesday is plenary meeting day jeanne: break sessions for the group are available ... we can do breakout session date is 6-10 NOVEMBER 2017 jeanne: we did last min breakout session last year ... Shawn and I can do one this year on Wed if necessary we can get only a room for two hours jennison: I would be able to attend the session ... that would be a good public engagement ... CSUN will be a good venue for prototyping jeanne: CSUN and TPAC are good bookmarks for the silver TF projects ... we have a space offer from accessibility dept in community college for the meeting sarah: in the TPAC, there is brainstorming method and more which can be part of the prototype such as visioning workshop jeanne: any chance for connecting to meet up group? ... having 2 hour visioning workshop? jennison: that would be very attractive to the group ... I can help to find a venue jeanne: we can also bring TPAC people ... having accessibility meet up in the night will be good. jennison: our meet up schedule can be flexible 9th of november? jennison: our group is "bay area accessibility and inclusive design meet up" - have 900 members Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to talk with Dave to draw up a budget to support research - particularly self-reporting studies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/04/14-silver-minutes.html#action01]
Received on Friday, 14 April 2017 15:07:16 UTC