- From: Sarah Horton <shorton@paciellogroup.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:06:24 -0500
- To: Silver Task Force <public-silver@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Silver Task Force Teleconference
16 Dec 2016
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-irc
Attendees
Present
Dave, Jan, Jeanne, Jemma, Judy, Shawn
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
Sarah
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Stakeholder Map
2. [5]review updates to the Research Design page
3. [6]CSUN "Town Hall" description and catchy name
brainstorm
* [7]Summary of Action Items
* [8]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<jeanne> agenda:
trackbot, start meeting
<trackbot> Meeting: Silver Task Force Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 16 December 2016
<scribe> Scribe: Sarah
Shawn: Stakeholder map and stakeholder responses
Stakeholder Map
Link to stakeholder map doc:
[9]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XK_evYulIaLsYOlMjuDO
C763xWL2TOM9SvPjRX_d9ag/edit?usp=sharing
[9] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XK_evYulIaLsYOlMjuDOC763xWL2TOM9SvPjRX_d9ag/edit?usp=sharing
Shawn: Next step is to review the stakeholder map and
stakeholder submissions, turn map into wiki page
... Send to working group once wiki page, request suggestions
for roles that aren't on the map
... Take names from stakeholder submissions and fill in roles
<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne will create wiki page of map [recorded
in
[10]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action01]
[10] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-16 - Will create wiki page of map [on
Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23].
<scribe> ACTION: Shawn and Jemma will work on mapping names and
roles [recorded in
[11]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action02]
[11] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-17 - And jemma will work on mapping
names and roles [on Shawn Lauriat - due 2016-12-23].
Jeanne: Need to be cautious of names that are multiple roles,
don't want to make too many contacts when people have multiple
roles
Shawn: Verify roles when mapping
... Will be emailing people and listing roles, which is another
opportunity to verify accuracy of roles
Judy: What is concern of multiple roles?
Jeanne: People would get too many surveys
Judy: Surveys are different by role? Might want to find out
primary role. Might not want to exclude people from surveys
because they have perspectives
Shawn: Want to make sure people have a voice for different
roles
... People helping with surveys will have ideas on how to do it
Jeanne: Received two contacts from screen reader vendors
Shawn: Areas to expand stakeholder submissions: Accessibility
designers and developers, AT developers
... content providers/producers, designers, developers
... Disability organizations (need more diversity), IT
managers, lawyers
These are listed on the Stakeholder Roles and Activiites
spreadsheet in the "Action" column
[12]https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XK_evYulIaLsYOlMjuD
OC763xWL2TOM9SvPjRX_d9ag/edit?usp=sharing
[12] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XK_evYulIaLsYOlMjuDOC763xWL2TOM9SvPjRX_d9ag/edit?usp=sharing
Judy: Will help with identifying global representatives from
disability organizations
Shawn: Also more representation of people with disabilities
And platform developers, product managers, QA specialists
Shawn: 260 submissions so far, not too many duplicates
Judy: want to make sure there's a role for regulators, might be
policy makers? How are you populating
... How are you populating lawyers role?
Jeanne: Have only had survey to have people submit names. Have
only just starting reaching out to fill gaps
Judy: Will help out identifying international lawyers
... Also regulators role
<jeanne>
[13]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_
Projects
[13] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Research_Projects
<jemma> I think having "regulator' specifically in the
stakeholder map is very important as Judy addressed.
review updates to the Research Design page
Jeanne: Does the research data clarification work?
Dave: Yes, it answers the key questions, and address any issues
that arise.
Jemma: Data is raw data, not the analysis?
Jeanne: Most of data is surveys, doing in partnership with task
force
... Is there a way we can make that more clear?
<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne and Jemma to clarify language under
expectations related to data [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action03]
[14] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-18 - And jemma to clarify language
under expectations related to data [on Jeanne F Spellman - due
2016-12-23].
Jemma: May need an IRB (institutional review board) review if
we are doing research through universities
<Judy> [JB: Whether IRB applies would depend on where the
survey is conducted from]
Jeanne: Will need to consider that when we start setting up
surveys
Judy: What are the timelines for developing survey questions?
Typically most difficult part is developing questions and
getting feedback on how they are asked
... Quality of result depends on quality of questions
Jeanne: Agree completely, validity is extremely important,
research partners are important to help design the surveys
... Anyone who has IP or patents on any part that's written
into W3C specs will relinquish so that specs can be property of
W3C, thinking about this in advance so we don't get blocked
moving forward
... Have been discussing creating a community group for
researchers, gives us ability to ensure the patent/IP
requirements are set from the start of research
... Not decided, just under consideration
Judy: Might want to make sure it has clear purpose, make clear
coordination, Charter still under discussion, courteous to wait
until those issues are settled
Jeanne: Community group agreement, no restriction on faculty
except attribution if on spec
Dave: Good to be up front allows people to take part with
understanding, motivation is to contribute to developing
standards, significant impact, demonstrate work helped
influence development of standard
Jeanne: Would it help to describe how we will acknowledge their
work?
Dave: Academic review, looks a number of pubs, number of
citations, others include work that influences standards, would
be helpful to describe acknowledgement
<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne to determine how we can acknowledge
contributions [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action04]
[15] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-19 - Determine how we can acknowledge
contributions [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23].
This is the design plan document:
[16]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Design_Pl
an_for_Silver
[16] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Design_Plan_for_Silver
<scribe> ACTION: Jeanne will put each research activity in its
own row in the timeline so we can track the activities
separately [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action05]
[17] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-20 - Will put each research activity
in its own row in the timeline so we can track the activities
separately [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2016-12-23].
Dave: Next steps for research partners
... Lots of positive response to the way research community has
been asked to be involved
... Some people have identified specific activities that they
are interested in
... Next step could be to review areas of interest/expertise to
see how they map to research activities
Sarah: Some people have specific topics they want to make sure
are part of thinking for accessibility guidelines, might be
stakeholders
Dave: Might be good to create a short survey to identify how
people would be willing to be involved
Jeanne: Isn't that better to do one to one?
Dave: There are quite a few respondents, survey provides list
of options and provides option to provide more information
Shawn: Talking about having a generic response, making some
things targeted to specific background
Dave: Preference would be to have online form, allows people to
respond to taskforce rather than individual
... Taskforce partner could do follow-up
Jeanne: Dave, draft questions, Jeanne can turn into survey
<scribe> ACTION: Dave will draft questions and share with
taskforce [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action06]
[18] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Error finding 'Dave'. You can review and register
nicknames at
<[19]https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/users>.
[19] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/track/users
<scribe> ACTION: David will draft questions and share with
taskforce [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action07]
[20] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-21 - Will draft questions and share
with taskforce [on David Sloan - due 2016-12-23].
CSUN "Town Hall" description and catchy name brainstorm
Jeanne: Have CSUN session Friday at 3:20 in the Google room
... Need session name and description
Shawn: Adapt blurb from other session, reversed so it's "we
want your feedback"
... brainstorming names ensued
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Dave will draft questions and share with
taskforce [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action06]
[NEW] ACTION: David will draft questions and share with
taskforce [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne and Jemma to clarify language under
expectations related to data [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne to determine how we can acknowledge
contributions [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne will create wiki page of map [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Jeanne will put each research activity in its own
row in the timeline so we can track the activities separately
[recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: Shawn and Jemma will work on mapping names and
roles [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action02]
[21] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action06
[22] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action07
[23] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action03
[24] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action04
[25] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action01
[26] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action05
[27] http://www.w3.org/2016/12/16-silver-minutes.html#action02
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Sarah Horton
UX Strategy Lead
The Paciello Group
603 252-6052 mobile
This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 16:06:59 UTC