Re: Fwd: WCAG 3 Explainer to FPWD?

Michael,

I keep rewriting this because it can be read as snarky but isnt meant as such. Please read it with compassion for the tone.

I am only rarely confident of what the working group understood, understands, or will be understanding at any given point.

I didn’t realize this was a FPWD, so didn’t call that out in this or the following CFC request that confirmed the publication. Should I send an email and ask if anyone was unclear that agreement to publish was putting out a FPWD? The other option would be to send out another CFC but that is possibly confusing.

If everyone’s agreement was not to publish this as a FPWD, what other possible alternative were they agreeing to?

Other options?

Kind regards,

Rachael

On Nov 19, 2021, 3:48 PM -0500, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, wrote:
> Hmm. I was not interpreting that from the wording. If you are confident the WG understood this to be a CfC for FPWD, we can go ahead. Michael
> On 19/11/2021 3:24 p.m., Rachael Montgomery wrote:
> > Fyi to add all editors
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael
> > Date: Nov 19, 2021, 3:23 PM -0500
> > To: Michael Cooper
> > Cc: Jeanne Spellman , Rachael Bradley Montgomery
> > Subject: WCAG 3 Explainer to FPWD?
> >
> > > Michael – Please see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2021JulSep/0171.html
> > >
> > > Does that meet the need?
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
> > > Digital Accessibility Specialist
> > > Library of Congress
> > > Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov