Re: Fwd: Slide Deck

I could update it.  I'm not sure.  If we update it, we are altering what 
people used for the Design Sprint, which alters things.  I certainly can 
fix the spelling error (oops),  but I worry about major changes, like 
deleting a slide.

I think it is important for people to see some of the relevant research 
that we used.  Perhaps it could move to an Appendix.  I could also link 
to the wiki page of Silver Research, which might also be useful.

Silver Research Archive (wiki) 
<https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Silver_Research_Archive>

What do you think?

jeanne

On 10/26/2020 11:49 AM, Rachael Montgomery wrote:
> Should we be linking to this?
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> *From:* Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
> *Date:* Oct 26, 2020, 10:39 AM -0400
> *To:* Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>, 
> Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
> *Subject:* Slide Deck
>
>> Hi Rachael, Jeanne
>>
>> just reading through FPWD of WCAG 3.0
>> It links to the Research Summary slide deck.
>> I noticed 2 things, not sure who can change them:
>>
>> Slide 5: I noticed that the name of Jakob Nielsen is spelled incorrectly
>> (Nielson instead of Nielsen)
>> Slide 43 - the links to Mike Crabb's Analysis and Papers are still
>> missing - IMO if the draft is published these shold be in place or the
>> slide should go.
>>
>> Best,
>> Detlev
>>
>> --
>> Detlev Fischer
>> DIAS GmbH
>> (Testkreis is now part of DIAS GmbH)
>>
>> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
>>
>> http://www.dias.de
>> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>>