Re: Planning to close SHACL Community Group due to inactivity unless we hear from you

Thank you, Andrew. Does “the SHACL community” imply “the participants in this group”?

If the participants in this group are active (and using a tool that our own audit tools may not be aware of), then we should keep this group open. :)

Ian

> On Mar 7, 2023, at 9:16 AM, Andrii Berezovskyi <andriib@kth.se> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> To my knowledge, the SHACL community is active on Discord [1]. I am not certain if this would help your deliberation.
> 
> –Andrew
> 
> 
> [1]: https://discord.gg/jycRxFgU
> 
> On 2023-03-06, 19:31, "Team Community Process" <team-community-process@w3.org <mailto:team-community-process@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear participants in the
> 
> 
> SHACL Community Group
> https://www.w3.org/community/shacl/ <https://www.w3.org/community/shacl/>
> 
> 
> Your Community Group appears to have become inactive (per [1]). W3C plans to close this group in 10 days unless we hear compelling reasons from you to keep it open.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> CG/BG System
> 
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/about/faq/#close-inactive <https://www.w3.org/community/about/faq/#close-inactive>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 917 450 8783

Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2023 15:18:34 UTC