- From: Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:09:01 +0100
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Cc: public-shacl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPugn7Vdw9pSmfNf4AmALKVsd0N32sXhOvAWsj_vpuUtcE6uwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Le jeu. 18 févr. 2021 à 23:59, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> a écrit : > The main motivation for saying it is "often" an owl:Ontology is that shape > graphs may use owl:imports to follow prefix declarations, and the > rdfs:domain/range of owl:imports is owl:Ontology. > OK, thanks ! I missed that point about owl:imports domain/range. > Also, I believe many people in practice already assign rdf:type > owl:Ontology to the URI resource of the graph itself, for example to attach > comments and provenance information. > > Using owl:Ontology as an rdf:type does not imply that the graph must or > should declare OWL classes or properties. In fact many examples that I have > seen simply use owl:Ontology in conjunction with RDFS or even data graphs. > OK thanks - it just surprised me a bit at the beginning, and I was not aware of this practice. > What problems do you see? > None in particular; I just wanted to check that this was a practice I could safely rely on for tools development. Thank you for the clarification Thomas > Holger > > > On 2021-02-18 11:38 pm, Thomas Francart wrote: > > Hello > > Is a Shape Graph always an owl:Ontology ? (no, from the spec) > Why is it "often" (to quote Holger's last email here) declared as an > owl:Ontology ? > What are the advantages of stating it is of type owl:Ontology, if the > graph does not declare any new classes or properties or OWL axioms, but > only Shapes constraints ? and isn't this declaration misleading ? > Is this declaration an agreed best practice ? > > Thanks ! > Thomas > > -- > > *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* > Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux > *connaissances* > blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : > fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart > tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas > > -- *Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA* Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux *connaissances* blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
Received on Friday, 19 February 2021 08:09:27 UTC