Re: Question about negation from Håvard Ottestad on 2019-05-07 (public-shacl@w3.org from May 2019)

From: Håvard Ottestad <hmottestad@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 11:29:11 +0200
To: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
Cc: Public Shacl W3C <public-shacl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <278433FA-080C-45C0-A9BA-A0201FE7869F@gmail.com>

I was considering that as an option, but I’m struggling with the implications that has for negation in other aspects. Since it kinda implies that for-all gets converted to for-at-least-one. 

Håvard

> On 7 May 2019, at 11:08, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote:
> 
> I think it's something else: for this path, there must be two different values with the same lang tag.

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2019 09:29:37 UTC