Re: Question on value based constraints

Perfect, thanks a lot, Simon. This is also in line with what I found in
this tutorial:
https://de.slideshare.net/mobile/jpcik/rdf-data-validation-2017-shacl

Regards,

Felix

Am Donnerstag, 18. April 2019 schrieb Simon Steyskal <
simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>:

> fwiw, sh:and isn't really necessary though.. is this what you wanted ->
> https://gist.github.com/simonstey/e3add7ff0740dd95a4c80d26840ca3e3 ?
>
> br simon
>
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
>
> Am 2019-04-17 18:41, schrieb Simon Steyskal:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> have you tried combining sh:xone with two sh:and constraints?
>>
>> e.g. something along the lines of:
>>
>> sh:xone (
>>    sh:and (
>>         ex:hasAddress sh:datatype xsd:string
>>         ex:addrType sh:hasValue "simple"
>>    )
>>
>>    sh:and (
>>         ex:hasAddress sh:class ex:complexAddr
>>         ex:addrType sh:hasValue "comolex"
>>    )
>> )
>>
>> (I'm on mobile right now so just pseudocode)
>>
>> br simon
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>
>> Date: 4/17/19 18:26 (GMT+01:00)
>> To: public-shacl@w3.org
>> Subject: Question on value based constraints
>>
>> HI all,
>>
>> I have a question on how to model alternative constraints based on
>> literal values.
>>
>> Let's assume the two alternatives ways to express an address:
>>
>> ALTERNATIVE 1:
>> ex:person1 ex:hasAddress "Street xzy plz 12345 ..."
>> ex:person1 ex:addressType "simpleAddress".
>>
>> ALTERNATIVE 2:
>>
>> ex:person1 ex:hasAddress ex:someComplexAddress1 # object is an
>> instance of class ex:complexAddress
>> ex:person1 ex:addressType "complexAddress".
>>
>> I want to define two alternative shapes for addresses: one is simple,
>> i.e. the literal value "Street xzy plz 12345 ...", and one is complex,
>> i.e. an instance of ex:complexAddress.
>>
>> How do I model the choice between the two address' shapes based on the
>> values "simpleAddress" vs. "complexAddress"?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Felix
>>
>