- From: J. Fernando Sánchez <jfernando@dit.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:35:42 +0200
- To: Pavel Velikhov <pavel.velikhov@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-sentiment@w3.org" <public-sentiment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP=SOLYWzU01YaASsAONnfYQkNeezqdFEQ7zimt_RTn8T3Kx2A@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, You can find the minutes of the meeting here: https://www.w3.org/community/sentiment/wiki/Meetings To those of you who joined: thank you. Feel free to add anything I might have missed and remove anything that should not be public. The summary is that we need a better review the state of the art for a comprehensive survey. We defined some action points, which we will check in our next meeting on *7th July, 13.00 CEST*. @Pavel, welcome to the community group!. I believe aspect-based sentiment analysis is an important use case for us, and it is also in our interest to have more quality datasets. A common LD model should improve the accessibility/interoperability of different datasets and ease the development of a common toolset. Regards, On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Pavel Velikhov <pavel.velikhov@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, I was late for the call today, looked up CEST incorrectly. And at the > end of the call something happened to my Skype, seems like nobody could > hear me… > > So I’m a bit in the dark about the next steps of the group. > > My interest is quite simple and I think is shared by a number of companies > in the industry: we develop technologies for aspect-based sentiment > analysis, but both the training data available and benchmark results need a > lot more work to be useful. So that’s my main interest and I’d be happy to > share all the details of what I think we’re missing now. >
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 14:36:30 UTC