- From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:43:07 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: Bernhard Schandl <bernhard.schandl@univie.ac.at>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "public-semweb-ui@w3.org" <public-semweb-ui@w3.org>
Sent from my mobile, which insists on top posting On 25 Jun 2009, at 12:16, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:59 +0200, Bernhard Schandl wrote: > >> However many "newbies" to RDF and ontologies are confused by this, >> because the triple >> >> foaf:Agent foaf:holdsAccount foaf:OnlineAccount . >> >> is actually not contained in the ontology. > > What needs to be communicated is that: > > [ a foaf:Agent ] foaf:holdsAccount [ a foaf:OnlineAccount ] . > > instead. Those triples are not actually in the ontology itself +1 I was writing a similar reply, but Toby beat me to it (and did a fancy diagram). In my experience the issue is conveying the implication of the schema. Damian
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 11:44:09 UTC