- From: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:31:45 +0200
- To: r@iannel.la
- Cc: "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF5CE39FC9.F89B391B-ONC1257FC0.0028C56C-C1257FC0.00295C07@agfa.com>
re:https://schema.org/Physician Hi Renato, Some of your thoughts need a deep discussions. Can you attend one of ScheMed or FHIR RDF group meetings and raise such points? This will allow to associate other's views as well. I will just make a small comment on the https://schema.org/Physician. This need an improvements (in definition I mean) and this on way! This is not the only one term/Type/concept to be improved, there are couple of such terms under improvements. This is the work being done by ScheMed W3C CG. https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=Physician+ https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1114 etc.. Kind Regards, Marc Twagirumukiza From: Renato Iannella <r@iannel.la> To: "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Date: 27/05/2016 09:13 Subject: Re: FHIR on schema.org > On 27 May 2016, at 11:09, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > I think it is important to distinguish two separate and orthogonal concerns: > 1. What data should be shared or exchanged? > 2. What does the data mean? > Security and privacy are all about #1 -- not #2. > Schema.org and healthcare vocabularies address #2 -- not #1. I don’t think that is the case. Schema.org's dual purpose is to "promote schemas for structured data on web pages", so this includes the exchange of such data as a key driver behind creating the terms on schema.org. Hence, whether we like it or not, just specifying personal data as a property in schema.org does not mean we can then not address how privacy is handled. This is especially relevant for healthcare data. My (other related) point is *why* do we need to create a set of schema.org URIs for the same FHIR URIs ? For example, we already have http://hl7.org/fhir/MedicationOrder We do we now need (and maintain): http://schema.org/MedicationOrder ?? > They are all about creating a shared understanding of what the data means, in order to achieve interoperability between parties that have already decided to exchange data. As an aside, look at the schema.org definition for a Physician: https://schema.org/Physician I hope that is not shared too widely ;-) Renato
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 07:32:14 UTC