W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Invitation to review the health extension in schema.org

From: Timothy Cook <tim@datainsights.tech>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 06:21:12 -0300
Message-ID: <CAENjPc_zRfpLoAo_0tzXTUuJenOPd4G_DfRxeuFrskWf_HoXbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael.Lawley@csiro.au
Cc: twamarc@gmail.com, Timothy Cook <tim@mlhim.org>, public-schemed@w3.org, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, public-vocabs@w3.org
Michael,

Initially, I too had questions about the varying levels of granularity.
However, the documentation http://webschemas.org/docs/meddocs.html clearly
states that this is not for clinical data markup or data exchange. The
intent is for use in web environments.


On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 8:36 PM, <Michael.Lawley@csiro.au> wrote:

> Hi Marc, a quick look at the MedicationStrength structure shows that
> there's no capacity to distinguish between the active ingredient and the
> corresponding basis-of-strength substance.
>
> It's also unclear to me how to represent multi-ingredient medications, but
> that may just be my unfamiliarity with the representation in use.
>
> Michael
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 7:23 PM, Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The target is the next release of schema.org hoping the reviewing process
> will be successful!
>
> On 25 March 2016 at 10:04, Timothy W. Cook <tim@mlhim.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear ALL,
>>>
>>> This is an invitation to help in reviewing the  health extension vocab
>>> in schema.org as it's now targeted to be published soon.
>>>
>>>
>> ​Is there an actual date assigned for publication? It would be helpful to
>> know.
>> --Tim
>> ​
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
Timothy W. Cook, President
Data Insights, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 06:31:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:21:56 UTC