- From: Courtney, Paul K. <Paul_Courtney@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 23:59:25 +0000
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "Julian, Anthony J." <ajulian@mayo.edu>, "john.hatem@oracle.com" <john.hatem@oracle.com>, "Lorraine,Constable (lorraine@constable.ca)" <lorraine@constable.ca>, "Paul Knapp" <pknapp@pknapp.com>, Andy Stechishin <andy.stechishin@gmail.com>, Charles Mead <charles.normanmead@gmail.com>
- CC: Grahame Grieve <grahame@healthintersections.com.au>, Lloyd McKenzie <lloyd@lmckenzie.com>
Hi David, This one worked just fine. I was wondering if I something had happened to the first file while I downloaded it. Thanks! Cheers, Paul -----Original Message----- From: David Booth [mailto:david@dbooth.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 5:14 PM To: its@lists.hl7.org; w3c semweb HCLS; Julian, Anthony J.; john.hatem@oracle.com; Lorraine,Constable (lorraine@constable.ca); Paul Knapp; Andy Stechishin; Charles Mead Cc: Grahame Grieve; Lloyd McKenzie Subject: Re: (DRAFT) HL7 PSS for computable semantic links from FHIR to RIM Apparently the version that I sent is in a format that gets blocked for security. Try the attached version instead. I hope this one can be opened. Thanks, David Booth On 06/23/2015 04:25 PM, David Booth wrote: > Attached is a slightly revised draft PSS, as edited on today's HL7/W3C > RDF call. Some key things to check: > > - There was some discussion that this project might be more > appropriately owned by the FHIR Infrastructure group, and co-sponsored > by M&M and ITS, instead of being under ARB, though it is fine for it > to start under ARB. > > - We added some additional names to the Project Team: Grahame > Grieve, Lloyd McKenzie and Rob Hausam. Grahame was the only one whose > name was added without being present, so I took an action to check: > Grahame, are you okay with being listed as a Project Facilitator? > > - Section 3.b Project Need uses the phrase "text links". Lloyd, do > you think that phrasing is adequate as is, or would you suggest a > different phrasing? (Lloyd had to drop before we got to review that > part.) > > - In Section 3.g a Target Date of Jan 2016 is listed. There was > some question about whether that is too ambitious or should be left as > a good target. > > Unfortunately I neglected to turn on "track changes" before making > modifications, but hopefully you can run a comparison to see the > differences if necessary. The previous version is here: > http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arb_fhir_rim/scmsvn/?action=browse&pa > th=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FArB-computable%2520semantic%2520links%2 > 520from%2520FHIR%2520-PSS.docx > > > Thanks! > David Booth The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2015 23:59:54 UTC