Re: Decision on decimal

     Hello,

  If you care about precision, why not give the standard error or a
confidence interval?

     Best, Oliver


On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Anthony Mallia <amallia@edmondsci.com>
wrote:

> Here is where I think we landed today on decimal
>
> fhir:decimal rdf:type owl:Class ;
>              rdfs:subClassOf fhir:Element ,
>                              [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
>                                owl:onProperty fhir:fractionDigits ;
>                                owl:maxQualifiedCardinality
> "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
>                                owl:onDataRange xsd:nonNegativeInteger
>                              ] ,
>                              [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
>                                owl:onProperty fhir:fractionDigits ;
>                                owl:allValuesFrom xsd:nonNegativeInteger
>                              ] ,
>                              [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
>                                owl:onProperty fhir:value ;
>                                owl:maxQualifiedCardinality
> "1"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
>                                owl:onDataRange xsd:decimal
>                              ] ,
>                              [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ;
>                                owl:onProperty fhir:value ;
>                                owl:allValuesFrom xsd:decimal
>                              ] ;
>
>              rdfs:comment "A rational number with defined precision" .
>
> Tony Mallia
>



-- 
Oliver Ruebenacker
Senior Software Engineer, Diabetes Portal
<http://www.type2diabetesgenetics.org/>, Broad Institute
<http://www.broadinstitute.org/>