- From: Vladimir Mironov <vladimir.n.mironov@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:11:26 +0100
- To: snachimuthu@mmm.com
- Cc: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>, w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJkfscDZeg86PUQKwnGprRpBTOBP7SmvF=QnJo69mCQ2n3V0jg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I'm not quite sure that any of the constituents of a triple is a member of the data set (the triple certainly is). Let me give a parable. "Mick Jagger is part of the Rolling Stones. Mick's thumb is part of Mick Jagger." Is Mick's thumb part of the Rolling Stones? Cheers On 9 December 2014 at 23:36, <snachimuthu@mmm.com> wrote: > We use "has member" to relate arbitrary groups and their members. Our > implementation is for binary relationships in a relational database, and so > this should work for RDF too. > > Senthil. > ------------------------------ > > *Senthil K. Nachimuthu, MD, PhD* | Medical Informaticist > 3M Health Information Systems, Inc. > 575 W Murray Blvd, Murray, UT 84123, USA > Office: +1 801 265 4636 > *snachimuthu@mmm.com* <snachimuthu@mmm.com> | *www.3mtcs.com* > <http://www.3mtcs.com/> > > > > > From: Vladimir Mironov <vladimir.n.mironov@gmail.com> > To: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com> > Cc: w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > Date: 12/09/2014 03:20 PM > Subject: Re: linking a symbol with a dataset > ------------------------------ > > > > Hi Michel, > > as everybody knows, atomic means 'indivisible'. In the world of Nature, of > course, there is nothing atomic. > However, in the world of RDF subject, predicate, and object are atomic - > there are no other concepts these three could be subdivided into. > I haven't seen such a property so far in vocabularies, I proposed it > because you guys could not find anything suitable for the task. > I feel it serves the purpose and nothing may prevent you from introducing > a new property in want of appropriate ones. This one should be, of course, > a subProperty of 'partOf'. > > Cheers > > On 9 December 2014 at 19:36, Michel Dumontier < > *michel.dumontier@gmail.com* <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > Can you elaborate with a definition for 'isAtomicPartOf'? Is this > already defined in a vocabulary? > > m. > Michel Dumontier > Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford > University > Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest > Group > *http://dumontierlab.com* <http://dumontierlab.com/> > > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Vladimir Mironov > <*vladimir.n.mironov@gmail.com* <vladimir.n.mironov@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > how about 'isAtomicPartOf'? > > > > Vladimir > > > > On 8 December 2014 at 18:04, Michel Dumontier < > *michel.dumontier@gmail.com* <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> On the call today we discussed the issue [1] of linking a symbol in > >> a triple (e.g. a subject, a predicate, *or* an object) to a dataset. > >> The use case for this is twofold : to provide a direct link between > >> data items and their datasets in a Linked Data manner, and to survey > >> the use of data items across datasets. While we agreed that using a > >> relation such as dc:isPartOf is fairly natural to link the triple > >> itself to the dataset, it is much less clear for linking the > >> components to the dataset. In Bio2RDF we used void:inDataset, but the > >> domain of this relation is a foaf:Document, so it muddies the > >> semantics by entailing a possible disjoint type with whatever the > >> subject has been typed with (e.g. protein, disease, etc). > >> > >> We discussed the suitability of existing vocabularies, but none, to > >> our knowledge, clearly fit the situation. For instance, can > >> dc:isPartOf (*http://purl.org/dc/terms/isPartOf* > <http://purl.org/dc/terms/isPartOf>) be used as a logical > >> partition of the dataset with the data item? or is SIO's refers to > >> (*http://semanticscience.org/resource/refers-to* > <http://semanticscience.org/resource/refers-to>) potential suitable, if > >> not somewhat vague? > >> > >> We welcome your thoughts on the matter. Do you know of a suitable > >> relation? Should we consider some new relation such as utilizes / > >> is-utilized-in or is-data-item-in / has-data-item? > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > >> m. > >> > >> [1] *https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions/issues/90* > <https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions/issues/90> > >> > >> Michel Dumontier > >> Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford > >> University > >> Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest > >> Group > >> *http://dumontierlab.com* <http://dumontierlab.com/> > >> > > > >
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: 01-part
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2014 06:11:57 UTC