- From: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:04:24 -0800
- To: w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi all, On the call today we discussed the issue [1] of linking a symbol in a triple (e.g. a subject, a predicate, *or* an object) to a dataset. The use case for this is twofold : to provide a direct link between data items and their datasets in a Linked Data manner, and to survey the use of data items across datasets. While we agreed that using a relation such as dc:isPartOf is fairly natural to link the triple itself to the dataset, it is much less clear for linking the components to the dataset. In Bio2RDF we used void:inDataset, but the domain of this relation is a foaf:Document, so it muddies the semantics by entailing a possible disjoint type with whatever the subject has been typed with (e.g. protein, disease, etc). We discussed the suitability of existing vocabularies, but none, to our knowledge, clearly fit the situation. For instance, can dc:isPartOf (http://purl.org/dc/terms/isPartOf) be used as a logical partition of the dataset with the data item? or is SIO's refers to (http://semanticscience.org/resource/refers-to) potential suitable, if not somewhat vague? We welcome your thoughts on the matter. Do you know of a suitable relation? Should we consider some new relation such as utilizes / is-utilized-in or is-data-item-in / has-data-item? Cheers! m. [1] https://github.com/joejimbo/HCLSDatasetDescriptions/issues/90 Michel Dumontier Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest Group http://dumontierlab.com
Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 17:05:11 UTC