On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > >> >> On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On 22 March 2013 12:05, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > .... >> > I am not saying that science presented as fact is infallible. Of course >> it is. >> >> I think you mean, of course it isn't. >> > > Indeed I do. Damn you double negation ;) > Of course, science presented as fact isn't infallible. Of course, science presented as fact is fallible. Just in case following the pronouns across email messages is worse than getting double negations right. > >> Pat >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 05:22:09 UTC