- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:19:04 +1000
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
On 22 March 2013 15:15, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > On Mar 21, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 22 March 2013 12:05, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com> wrote: >> >> >> .... >> I am not saying that science presented as fact is infallible. Of course it is. > > I think you mean, of course it isn't. That was how I read it also. Peter
Received on Friday, 22 March 2013 05:19:31 UTC