- From: Umutcan ŞİMŞEK <s.umutcan@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:02:54 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Thanks for the quick answer : ) So this issue is that subjective for contexts which allows to use owl:sameAs to link resources if they are not semantically even a little bit related in real world? Sorry if I'm asking too basic questions. I'm still a rookie at this :D Umutcan On 15-03-2013 19:38, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 3/15/13 1:05 PM, Umutcan ŞİMŞEK wrote: >> My question is, does LODD use owl:sameAs properly? For instance, are >> those two resources, dbpedia:Metamizole and drugbank:DB04817 (code >> for Metamizole), really identical? Or am I getting the word >> "property" in the paper wrong? > The question is always about: do those URIs denote the same thing? Put > differently, do the two URIs have a common referent? > > ## Turtle ## > > <#i> owl:sameAs <#you>. > > ## End ## > > That's a relation in the form of a 3-tuple based statement that > carries entailment consequences for a reasoner that understand the > relation semantics. Through some "context lenses" the statement above > could be accurate, in others totally inaccurate. > > Conclusion, beauty lies eternally in the eyes of the beholder :-) >
Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 18:03:29 UTC