Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! from KANZAKI Masahide on 2013-07-02 (public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org from July 2013)

From: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 12:51:26 +0900
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
Cc: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com>, W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, egov-ig mailing list <public-egov-ig@w3.org>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAHQ1n3AsTXzAXO6ETrzGn+4k12C-EOjrBsFUveUbOmHDmNjkAA@mail.gmail.com>

Excuse me, 2-stars and 3-stars data are still good and valuable, though
4-stars+ is, of course, better and encouraged.

best regards,


2013/7/2 Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>

>  Two star sucks. So does three star. If you're extremely proud of two and
> three star data, you're missing the point.
>
>
-- 
@prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name
"KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"].

Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 03:51:54 UTC