Re: CC-ND waver/license and data 'reuse'

I would expect that Creative Commons would have a strong interest in
pursuing violations of any of their CC licenses, if only to establish their
legitimacy if that hasn't already happened. The Free Software Foundation
(FSF) has pursued violations of the GPL and LGPL on a number of occasions
on behalf of free software projects.

I'm curious though (this could be a separate thread), whether you're
looking to use CC-ND or are looking to dissuade others from using it, or
something else. It seems that it would be a very poor license to release
research data under. What is the reasoning for using this?

Jim


On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Susanna Sansone <sa.sansone@gmail.com>wrote:

>  Hi all,
> calling on your expertise, please.
> I am looking for real experiences and examples showing if and how a CC-ND
> waver/license for data files and related experimental descriptors *limits
> its reuse* (as derivative works won't be allowed, e.g. data mush-ups,
> linked data).
> Beside the official CC pages on CC-ND and several sites echoing the same
> text and theory, does any of you/working groups have direct experience on
> this matter? Also pointers to articles and white papers is very much
> appreciated.
> Many thanks in advance,
> Susanna
>
> --
> Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhDuk.linkedin.com/in/sasansone
>
> University of Oxford e-Research Centre
>  Principal Investigator, Team Leader
>  isacommons.org | biosharing.org
>
> Nature Publishing Group
>  Consultant
>  Data Products
> --
>
>


-- 
Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-4436
http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mccusj@cs.rpi.edu
http://tw.rpi.edu