- From: Oktie Hassanzadeh <oktie@cs.toronto.edu>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:15:52 -0500
- To: Kerstin Forsberg <kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, em@zepheira.com, cdsouthan@hotmail.com, brendan.kelleher@karmadata.com, Adam.Jacobs@dianthus.co.uk
- Message-ID: <CA+-qEjWFKc853DRTyCmnXwcSaSoFYvp3bkTdRLd_nN_ecBW6nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Kerstin, Have you ever looked at http://linkedct.org ? LinkedCT uses a complex process to turn ClinicalTrials.gov into high-quality 5-start Linked Data. And yes it does provide HTTP URIs for all the "things" on ClinicalTrials.gov, provides HTML or RDF, SPARQL endpoint, etc. Please take a look at http://linkedct.org , http://linkedct.org/stats/ , and http://linkedct.org/faq/ , and the following articles for any questions you might have. Oktie Hassanzadeh, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh, Renée J. Miller: Linking Semistructured Data on the Web<http://webdb2011.rutgers.edu/papers/Paper%2027/paper27-camera-ready.pdf>. WebDB 2011 Oktie Hassanzadeh, Anastasios Kementsietsidis, Lipyeow Lim, Renée J. Miller, Min Wang: LinkedCT: A Linked Data Space for Clinical Trials<http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0567>. CoRR abs/0908.0567 2009 Cheers, Oktie ======================== Oktie Hassanzadeh oktie@cs.toronto.edu http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~oktie On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Kerstin Forsberg < kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > a couple of tweets, blog post comments 1) and email exchanges during the > week on moving ClinicalTrials.gov "from strings to things" made me think > this could be a topic for discussion at the upcoming CSHALS. As I'll not be > able to be there in person I'm using this email list to hear your thoughts. > > Background: > We see many nice examples of curated/standardized feeds of CT.gov data, > such as http://linkedct.org, http://www.patientslikeme.com/clinical_trialsand > http://www.clinicalcollections.org/trials/ etc.. Most of them do a good > job in turning “strings into things” and a few of them apply the Linked > Data principles. However, I don’t think any of them use http-based URIs to > identify things such as sponsor organization, clinical sites, clinical > investigators, geography, disease, drug, and time. > > I argue that we as a community caring for clinical trials data should push > back to FDA and NLM to get an official, standardized, linked data interface > directly to the CT.gov at source. And yes, also for FDA and NLM to push > back to pharma companies to provide standardized data about our trials with > URIs to identify things instead of all these text strings. And also if > pharma company websites such as http://www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com/and > http://www.astrazenecaclinicaltrials.com/ did the same. > > Given the current movement for clinical trial data transparency 2) I may > think the timing is good. But, potentially challenging both for FDA, NLM > and for the pharma companies. They (we) will all look for practical advice > on what URIs to use for things such as drugs and organizations. > > Thoughts? > Kerstin > > > 1) > http://blog.karmadata.com/2013/02/11/loading-clinical-trials-data-in-ten-minutes-flat/comment-page-1/#comment-20 > 2) > http://www.placebocontrol.com/2013/02/our-new-glass-house-gsks-commitment-to.html >
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2013 14:19:45 UTC