- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:18:28 -0400
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51644D64.60105@openlinksw.com>
On 4/9/13 12:40 PM, Phillip Lord wrote: > Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> writes: > >> On 4/9/13 11:31 AM, Phillip Lord wrote: >>> Compare all you like. RDF is just another technology; it's not going to >>> let me do anything that I cannot do in another way. >> So you are questioning its unique selling points, I assume? > No. I don't care. I just care whether it's useful. Who cares whether > it's uniquely useful. > >> If so, can you point us to a technology that addresses the issue of >> grounding logic in data >> -- in a manner that's totally platform independent? > It's a data representation technology. Lots of things do this. "Totally > platform independent". I don't know what "platform" means these days. > >> We want to be able to leverage logic in the process of actual data >> representation, access, integration, and management. I know of no technology >> that addresses the problem like RDF i.e., in a platform agnostic manner that >> echoes the essence of the Web itself. > RDF is nice. It's useful. It will remain useful, at least if people are > allowed to use it without being told that they are doing it all wrong. > > I am not attacking RDF; I am attacking the notion that everything has to > be perfect, to work in every circumstance, for it to be useful at all. > > Phil > > > Phil, I do agree totally with the notion of not teaching folks RDF by always inferring that they are doing it wrong :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 17:18:51 UTC