- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:30:53 -0400
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:31:15 UTC
On 4/3/13 3:12 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote: >> >There is, I think, a sustainable argument that blank nodes are not*necessary*. > I beg to differ. Blank nodes are absolutely necessary. "Horses for courses" again. Blank nodes are only problematic when misunderstood and used inappropriately. No different to misusing a Pronoun due to lack of understanding when learning a new language that has Pronouns. A lot of these issues will whither away as RDF's broader pitch narrative improves, which has started to happen in recent times :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 19:31:15 UTC