On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, David Booth wrote: > On 03/27/2013 10:56 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > >> On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Jim McCusker wrote: >> >>> If only owl:sameAs were used correctly... >>> >> >> Well, I agree that is a problem, but don't draw the conclusion that >> there is something wrong with sameAs, just because people keep using >> it wrong. >> > > Agreed. And furthermore, don't draw the conclusion that someone has used > owl:sameAs wrong just because you get garbage when you merge two graphs > that individually worked just fine. Those two graphs may have been written > assuming different sets of interpretations. In that case I would certainly conclude that they have used it wrong. Have you not been reading what Pat and I have been writing? -Alan > > David Booth > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2013 21:02:31 UTC