- From: <Peter.Hendler@kp.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:15:21 -0700
- To: LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu
- Cc: eric@w3.org, helena.deus@deri.org, kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com, meadch@mail.nih.gov, mscottmarshall@gmail.com, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, ratnesh.sahay@deri.org
- Message-ID: <OF1889B959.1E2C9274-ON88257A7C.0079C10B-88257A7C.007A4133@kp.org>
We (Kaiser) have been doing this without the labels for many years. We have an extensional model (which is just our proprietary E.H.R) and we limit SNOMED terms to the "what" using Clinical findings and Procedures. We first do SNOMED subsumptions independent of our clinical model. That returns us a list of SNOMED codes. We then, in a separate step use those codes in an extensional (SQL) query to get the associated MRNs we need. This is a generalized way to so what we do. If you are all in one organization and you have agreements that act in place of SNLs then you don't have to make them explicit. This is a way to make them explicit in models we may get from elsewhere. We have about 9 million patients and have been doing this ever since we've had our E.H.R. By keeping the SNOMED "walled off" we can always safely use the reasoners without worrying about non intensional junk on the nodes. NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. "Lin MD, Simon" <LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu> 09/17/2012 03:02 PM To Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM, "ratnesh.sahay@deri.org" <ratnesh.sahay@deri.org> cc "eric@w3.org" <eric@w3.org>, "helena.deus@deri.org" <helena.deus@deri.org>, "kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com" <kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com>, "meadch@mail.nih.gov" <meadch@mail.nih.gov>, "mscottmarshall@gmail.com" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Subject RE: Our white paper on Semantic Node Labeling in Clinical models Do you have a toy example running, or a fully functional system running? Simon ================================================== Simon Lin, MD | Director, Biomedical Informatics Research Center | Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation | 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449 | 715-221-7299 | Lin.Simon@mcrf.mfldclin.edu | www.marshfieldclinic.org/birc For scheduling assistance, please contact Crystal Gumz, Administrative Secretary | 715-221-6403 | gumz.crystal@mcrf.mfldclin.edu From: Peter.Hendler@kp.org [mailto:Peter.Hendler@kp.org] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 4:20 PM To: ratnesh.sahay@deri.org Cc: eric@w3.org; helena.deus@deri.org; kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com; Lin MD, Simon; meadch@mail.nih.gov; mscottmarshall@gmail.com; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Our white paper on Semantic Node Labeling in Clinical models This very clearly (to me at least) explains the problem and suggested solution to some of the problems we (Kaiser) see in clinical models. Wonder who agrees? NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your cooperation.
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: 01-part
Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 22:18:11 UTC