- From: Mark <markw@illuminae.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:39:48 -0600
- To: "David Booth" <david@dbooth.org>, "Erich Gombocz" <egombocz@io-informatics.com>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, biohackathon@googlegroups.com
- Cc: HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, linkedlifedatapracticesnote@googlegroups.com, public-lod@w3.org
> About the use of a priori , a posteriori - I will mull that over. I > was pretty happy with the way it seemed to communicate our thoughts, a > little attached actually.. :( I think it might be better as "post facto"...?? M
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 21:40:33 UTC