- From: M. Scott Marshall <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:24:14 +0200
- To: "Deus, Helena" <helena.deus@deri.org>, Peter.Hendler@kp.org, "Sahay, Ratnesh" <ratnesh.sahay@deri.org>, kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com, LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu, meadch@mail.nih.gov
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACHzV2M2ECEvzdQj9C11y7EL0HqHuLctVSe6rjLtKFKnMww79g@mail.gmail.com>
I took some rough notes at http://www.w3.org/2012/08/21-hcls-minutes.html . Best, Scott On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Deus, Helena <helena.deus@deri.org> wrote: > This is the link to webex: > https://deri.webex.com/deri/e.php?AT=WMI&EventID=221308912&PW=ba46734c575b5e5216131004&RT=MTgjMjE%3D > **** > > More info below… > > Please join my Personal Conference meeting that is currently in > progress. > > Topic: HCLS standards - Helena > Date: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 > Time: 2:00 pm, GMT Summer Time (London, GMT+01:00) > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To join the audio portion of the Personal Conference meeting > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Call-in toll-free number (UK): 0800-051-3810 > Call-in toll number (UK): +44-20-310-64804 > Backup call-in toll number (US/Canada)*: 1-408-792-6300 > Global call-in numbers: > https://deri.webex.com/deri/globalcallin.php?serviceType=MC&ED=221308912&tollFree=1 > > Toll-free dialing restrictions: > http://www.webex.com/pdf/tollfree_restrictions.pdf > > Attendee access code: 302 820 94 > > * Backup call-in toll number (US/Canada) should only be used if the > primary number does not work. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To join the online portion of the Personal Conference meeting > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > 1. Go to > https://deri.webex.com/deri/e.php?AT=WMI&EventID=221308912&PW=3f1398cb797709000d787b777a&RT=MTgjMjE%3D > 2. If requested, enter your name and email address. > 3. If a password is required, enter the Meeting Password: 30282094 > 4. Click "Join" > > To view in other time zones or languages, please click the link: > > https://deri.webex.com/deri/e.php?AT=WMI&EventID=221308912&PW=3f1398cb797709000d787b777a&ORT=MTgjMjE%3D > > ------------------------------------------------------- > For assistance > ------------------------------------------------------- > 1. Go to https://deri.webex.com/deri/mc > 2. On the left navigation bar, click "Support". > > You can contact me at: > helpdesk@deri.org > > > > > > http://www.webex.com > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This WebEx service includes a feature that allows audio > and any documents and other materials exchanged or viewed during the > session to be recorded. By joining this session, you automatically consent > to such recordings. If you do not consent to the recording, discuss your > concerns with the meeting host prior to the start of the recording or do > not join the session. Please note that any such recordings may be subject > to disc**** > > *From:* Peter.Hendler@kp.org [mailto:Peter.Hendler@kp.org] > *Sent:* 19 August 2012 20:09 > *To:* Sahay, Ratnesh > *Cc:* Deus, Helena; kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com; > LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; meadch@mail.nih.gov; > mscottmarshall@gmail.com; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Sahay, Ratnesh > > *Subject:* RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards**** > > ** ** > > I have just proposed an explicit way to address the problem and sent it > out internally for comments. I hope to be able to discuss it. Did we ever > finalize a date time and phone number for the discussion? > > > > > > > > > *NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:* If you are not the intended recipient of this > e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or > disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this > e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. > Thank you. > > > > > **** > > *"Sahay, Ratnesh" <ratnesh.sahay@deri.org>* **** > > 08/18/2012 02:13 PM **** > > To**** > > "Sahay, Ratnesh" <ratnesh.sahay@deri.org>, "Deus, Helena" < > helena.deus@deri.org>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com> **** > > cc**** > > Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM, <LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu>, > "Kerstin Forsberg" <kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com>, <meadch@mail.nih.gov>, > "HCLS hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> **** > > Subject**** > > RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards**** > > ** ** > > > > > Regarding Peter’s concern (a very important one) on the extensional > (closed-world) and Intensional logics in context of HL7+ Semantic Web, one > of my publication (attached) discuses this in details. > > Regards, > Ratnesh > > *From:* Sahay, Ratnesh [mailto:ratnesh.sahay@deri.org<ratnesh.sahay@deri.org>] > * > Sent:* 18 August 2012 21:08* > To:* Deus, Helena; M. Scott Marshall* > Cc:* Peter.Hendler@kp.org; LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; Kerstin > Forsberg; meadch@mail.nih.gov; HCLS hcls* > Subject:* RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards > > Good pointer, Lena. > > Regards, > Ratnesh > > *From:* Helena Deus [mailto:helena.deus@deri.org <helena.deus@deri.org>] * > Sent:* 18 August 2012 21:05* > To:* M. Scott Marshall* > Cc:* Sahay, Ratnesh; Peter.Hendler@kp.org; LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; > Kerstin Forsberg; meadch@mail.nih.gov; HCLS hcls* > Subject:* Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards > > A few papers in this special issue in the Journal of Biomedical > Informatics (translating standards into practice) may be relevant for this > discussion: > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046412000962 > > Kind regards, > Lena > > Helena F. Deus, PhD > Unit Leader, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology > Digital Enterprise Research Institute > helena.deus@deri.org > +353 91 495 270 > > > > > > > On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > > I have made a new poll with timezone-support enabled: > http://doodle.com/kx7vrbhamd3s2wmd > > Helena, Kirsten, and Ratnesh - please fill the above poll in to avoid > misunderstanding about times. > > BTW, I also submitted a feature request to Doodle to make timezone-support > default enabled (opt out instead of opt in). > > Cheers, > Scott > > -- > M. Scott Marshall, PhD > MAASTRO clinic, http://www.maastro.nl/en/1/* > *http://eurecaproject.eu/* > *https://plus.google.com/u/0/114642613065018821852/posts* > *http://www.linkedin.com/pub/m-scott-marshall/5/464/a22 > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Deus, Helena <helena.deus@deri.org> > wrote: > Ups, I must have missed the “enable time zone support”, could you create a > new poll with time zone enabled, please, Scott? > > So far, only me and Kerstin responded to the doodle poll so not too much > harm done. > (@Kerstin, the default time zone was irish, by the way) > > Best, > Lena > > *From:* M. Scott Marshall [mailto:mscottmarshall@gmail.com] * > Sent:* 17 August 2012 13:33* > To:* Deus, Helena* > Cc:* Sahay, Ratnesh; Peter.Hendler@kp.org; LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; > kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com; meadch@mail.nih.gov; > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Fox, Ronan* > Subject:* Re: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards > > Hi Helena, > > Good initiative all. > > Would you please create a doodle with the timezone option (it's easy to > miss unfortunately)? > > Also unfortunate that, last I checked, Doodle doesn't let you edit that > config option in but requires you to create an entirely new doodle. > > Cheers, > Scott > > n.b. Doodle should make timezones the default! The current design has > caused a lot of confusion and wasted time with international collaborators. > > -- > M. Scott Marshall, PhD > MAASTRO clinic, http://www.maastro.nl/en/1/* > *http://eurecaproject.eu/* > *https://plus.google.com/u/0/114642613065018821852/posts* > *http://www.linkedin.com/pub/m-scott-marshall/5/464/a22 > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Helena Deus <helena.deus@deri.org> > wrote: > Hi All, > > There seems to be a lot of interest in brainstorming about this. > How about doing an ad hoc call for this? > > I've set up a doodle pole so that we can try to agree on a date next week: > http://doodle.com/g5vimt6gyshv77fd > > We can use W3C systems, I presume, right, Eric? > Kind Regards , > Helena > > Helena F. Deus, PhD > Unit Leader, Bioinformatics and Computational Biology > Digital Enterprise Research Institute > helena.deus@deri.org > +353 91 495 270 > > > > > > > On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Sahay, Ratnesh wrote: > > Hi Peter and All, > > I think entities that are part of Version 3 XML *coreSchemas* (e.g, > Vocabulary ) can be represented in OWL or DL, however problem is with local > models (e.g., RMIM) that are context-specific (i.e., time, place, event > dependent information). One observation in the article below: “One major > characteristic of this Extensional logic is that "classes must be extended > by the authors of the model.". It is also the case with the Intensional > logic. For example, class-subclass relation needs to be explicitly stated > here as well, with a feature of inference that may entail additional > relations. I think one of the main differences between closed-world > UML/object-oriented paradigm and open-world (ontologies) is use of > properties. An ontology property appears, at a first glance, to be the > same as the UML association or attribute. However, properties in an > ontology are first-class modelling elements, while the UML association or > attribute is attached to UML classes where they are described. This means > the UML association or attribute cannot exist in isolation or as a > self-describing entity defining relationships such as inheritance. More > precisely, in an ontology a relation can exist without specifying any > classes to which it might relate. Some key benefits that I see of using > Semantic Web for the HL7 standard: > > (1 ) Semantic Web technologies as a “common medium" where the upper layer > (Information Model or terminologies in OWL) and lower layer (data in RDF) > can be engaged with each other during the > integration process. Without the need of transformation (or mediation) > between them, as is the case with UML-XML based systems. > (2) The mutual use of Semantic Web technologies as a “common medium" > between upper and lower layers provide computable semantics of the > information models (as ontologies), improving > the reuse and overall data integration. > > There are other benefits (and limitations as well) but that require long > discussion. > > Regards, > Ratnesh > > *From:* Peter.Hendler@kp.org [mailto:Peter.Hendler@kp.org] * > Sent:* 15 August 2012 16:18* > To:* LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu* > Cc:* kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com; meadch@mail.nih.gov; > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org* > Subject:* RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards > > Just did a white paper on it. I don't think it's a good idea in general > to put clinical models all in OWL or DL at all. > That part is best left to the SNOMED vocabulary part. > > Here is a very recent paper on how to mix the Extensional and Intensional > parts of the models according to how HL7 V3 does it and how Kaiser does it. > * > *http://www.ringholm.com/docs/05000_Clinical_Models_and_SNOMED.htm > > > > * > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:* If you are not the intended recipient of this > e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or > disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this > e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. > Thank you. **** > > *"Lin MD, Simon" <**LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu*<LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu> > *>* **** > > 08/15/2012 08:11 AM **** > > ** ** > > To**** > > "Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]" <meadch@mail.nih.gov>, Kerstin Forsberg < > kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com>, HCLS hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> ** > ** > > cc**** > > Subject**** > > RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards**** > > > **** > > ** ** > > > > > > Great topic! I can imagine a potential white paper from this group. > > Besides technology, factors to consider might include: flexibility, > implementation cost, return on investments, path to migration etc. > > Best regards, > > Simon > > ================================================== > Simon Lin, MD > Director, Biomedical Informatics Research Center > Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation > 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449 > Office 715-221-7299 * > *Lin.Simon@mcrf.mfldclin.edu * > *www.marshfieldclinic.org/birc > > For scheduling assistance, please contact > Crystal Gumz, Administrative Secretary > gumz.crystal@mcrf.mfldclin.edu > 715-221-6403 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] [mailto:meadch@mail.nih.gov<meadch@mail.nih.gov>] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:02 AM > To: Kerstin Forsberg; HCLS hcls > Subject: RE: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards > > I would say Yes -- particularly since there is now an effort to represent > some of newest HL7 standards -- FHIR resource definitions in particular -- > using SW approaches...and the BRIDG OWL representation will almost > certainly benefit from this effort. > > charlie > ________________________________________ > From: Kerstin Forsberg [kerstin.l.forsberg@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 1:57 AM > To: HCLS hcls > Subject: FDA: seeks input on Study Data Exchange Standards > > FDA seeks "input from industry, technology vendors, and other members of > the public regarding the advantages and disadvantages of current and > emerging open, consensus-based standards for the exchange of regulated > study data. " > > In the annoncement for a meeting 5 November FDA ask for responses, before > 5 October, on questions such as "- What are the advantages and > disadvantages of HL7 v3 and CDISC ODM?" > > And, interestingly, they also ask: "- Are there other open data exchange > standards that should be evaluated?" > > Is this an opportunity for a semantic web based proposal? > > Kind Regards > > Kerstin Forsberg > > AstraZeneca > > > * > * > https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/08/14/2012-19748/regulatory-new-drug-review-solutions-for-study-data-exchange-standards-notice-of-meeting-request-for > > ______________________________________________________________________ > The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or > privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should > destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are > prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any > information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the > erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your > cooperation. > **** > -- M. Scott Marshall, PhD MAASTRO clinic, http://www.maastro.nl/en/1/ http://eurecaproject.eu/ https://plus.google.com/u/0/114642613065018821852/posts http://www.linkedin.com/pub/m-scott-marshall/5/464/a22
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:24:48 UTC