- From: Hammond, Tony <t.hammond@nature.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:14:59 +0100
- To: Jim McCusker <james.mccusker@yale.edu>
- CC: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CBB5CE63.396E0%t.hammond@nature.com>
Hi Jim: Indeed DOIšs are dereferencable. And in fact we do make use of this see our Sample query #2 below. Cheers, Tony == select * where { ?article a npg:Article ; npg:hasContributor ?contributor . ?contributor owl:sameAs ?crossref . } limit 25 == <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.89> <http://ns.nature.com/contributors/sara-lindstrom-3ic5xja3yjjka> <http://id.crossref.org/contributor/sara-lindstrom-3ic5xja3yjjka> . etc. On 19/04/2012 14:07, "Jim McCusker" <james.mccusker@yale.edu> wrote: > Recently I found out that doi.org <http://doi.org> URIs are actually > dereferenceable as RDF: > > http://inkdroid.org/journal/2011/04/25/dois-as-linked-data/ > > I'm a year behind the curve on this, but I hadn't heard about this from > anyone. > > This might be another good point of integration for NPG Linked Data. > > Jim > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Hammond, Tony <t.hammond@nature.com> wrote: >> Thanks, Jerven. >> >> That would make more sense. Will wait to see if therešs more feedback, but >> otherwise canšt see any reason why we shouldnšt change to use the NCBI links >> instead. >> >> Tony >> >> >> >> On 19/04/2012 13:45, "Jerven Bolleman" <me@jerven.eu <http://me@jerven.eu> > >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Tony, >>> >>> Last time I asked the NCBI help desk they preferred the use of >>> "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15618302" instead of going via >>> pubmed.org <http://pubmed.org> <http://pubmed.org> . >>> Let us know which you settle on and I will add owl:sameAs links from the >>> uniprot.org <http://uniprot.org> <http://uniprot.org> RDF as well. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jerven >>> >> >> ***************************************************************************** >> *** >> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who >> is >> not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in >> error >> please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage >> mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept >> liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not >> expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its >> agents. >> Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents >> accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or >> its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and >> attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan >> Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan >> Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number >> 785998 >> Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS >> ***************************************************************************** >> *** > >
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 13:15:55 UTC