- From: Hammond, Tony <t.hammond@nature.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:58:01 +0100
- To: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>
- CC: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CBB5CA69.396D8%t.hammond@nature.com>
Thanks, Jerven. That would make more sense. Will wait to see if therešs more feedback, but otherwise canšt see any reason why we shouldnšt change to use the NCBI links instead. Tony On 19/04/2012 13:45, "Jerven Bolleman" <me@jerven.eu> wrote: > Hi Tony, > > Last time I asked the NCBI help desk they preferred the use of > "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15618302" instead of going via pubmed.org > <http://pubmed.org> . > Let us know which you settle on and I will add owl:sameAs links from the > uniprot.org <http://uniprot.org> RDF as well. > > Regards, > Jerven > ******************************************************************************** DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its agents. Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 785998 Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS ********************************************************************************
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 12:58:37 UTC