- From: Mikel Egaņa Aranguren <megana@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:16:29 +0200
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Hi; On or., 2011.eko mairen 27a 08:35, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > Hi, > > long thread... I'm answering to this post, but I have read through it down > (at least to some point, I'm offline now). > > two things: > > - as for marketing and engagement of outside community, I'm not sure having > technological-oriented task forces is that bad. Sure BioRDF and LODD are > confusing, because they are names which relates to something largely unknown > outside the group. But if you have task forces on, say, biodatabases, > biostatistics, ... they may look more scientific already. It's a question of > mapping them to more established "scientific related fields". > > - to get back to my original post, how many people on this list would be > interested in environmental/agricultural/ecological data ? I am. In fact most probably I will get some funding from the government to publish enrionmental data as LOD in the following weeks Cheers > ciao, > Andrea > > Il giorno 26/mag/2011, alle ore 15.16, Mark ha scritto: > >> On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:55:07 -0700, Tim Clark >> <twclark@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: >> >>> I would lose the solution-based Task Groups and reformulate them as >>> problem-based. >>> >>> for example, BioRDF has been working on gene lists for transcriptomic >>> experiments, we might recharter that Task Group to work on Genomic >>> Experiments, for example, or whatever concept area the Task members like >>> and is a logical step from what they are doing now, but with a PROBLEM >>> FOCUS ... you see the point. >> >> I agree with Tim 100% on this. There are "subtle underlying benefits" to >> this approach that I'm quite sensitive to at the moment. In particular, >> since many of us are academics, it is important to look "scientific", as >> opposed to having the appearance of being engineers or software >> developers. Centering the groups around problems puts us firmly back on >> academic ground, and makes it easier for us to live our academic lives in >> peace :-) (and easier to get money from research-funding agencies) >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> > Andrea Splendiani > Senior Bioinformatics Scientist > Centre for Mathematical and Computational Biology > +44(0)1582 763133 ext 2004 > andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk > > > > > -- Mikel Egaņa Aranguren, PhD http://mikeleganaaranguren.com Marie Curie post-doc at Ontology Engineering Group, UPM http://www.oeg-upm.net/
Received on Friday, 27 May 2011 07:16:45 UTC