- From: Chris Mungall <cjmungall@lbl.gov>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:25:12 -0700
- To: "Mark Wilkinson" <markw@illuminae.com>
- Cc: HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "James Malone" <malone@ebi.ac.uk>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
It's not so different from Michel and Rob's approach - see Michel's email on this thread. It's also (deliberately) somewhat limited in power - for example, you can't selectively expand relations based on presence/absence of other triples. It would be nice to have a general purpose macro language as a W3C standard, from which these simpler approaches could be defined. On May 4, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote: > Chris, that's beautiful!! Well done! > > > M > > > On Wed, 04 May 2011 14:27:30 -0700, Chris Mungall <cjmungall@lbl.gov> wrote: > >> >> A number of ontologies are starting to use "shortcut" relations. These are expanded to more complex class expressions prior to OWL reasoning: >> >> http://precedings.nature.com/documents/5292/version/1 >> http://berkeleybop.org/~cjm/obo2owl/obo-syntax.html#7 > > > > -- > Dr. Mark Wilkinson > Assistant Professor, Medical Genetics > PI Bioinformatics, Institute for Heart and Lung Health > St. Paul's Hospital/UBC > Vancouver, BC, Canada
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 17:28:58 UTC