Re: My task from last week: Semantic free identifiers

Hi All,

Sorry to come in so late to this discussion but....

It would seem that the meaning that resides in the application (or in a
SPARQL query) should be part of the discussion.  Even if the data
identifiers have really fine readable meanings, an application can change
the semantics completely.  And, unless there are explanations of what the
app has done, no-one will be any the wiser unless the error is egregious (eg
-- the Eiffel tower is a dog).

Slides 51-52 of [1] are an attempt to diagram a way of dealing with app
semantics and data semantics together.

                             -- Adrian

[1]
ww.reengineeringllc.com/Internet_Business_Logic_e-Government_Presentation.pdf

Internet Business Logic
A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English Q/A over SQL
and RDF
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free, and there are no advertisements

Adrian Walker
Reengineering




On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mark <markw@illuminae.com> wrote:

>
>  If you want to work with a more sophisticated API - I might suggest the
>> OWL API. It's more powerful, but also more sophisticated
>>
>
>
> +++++++++1!!
>
> Mark
>
>