- From: Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:58:18 -0400
- To: "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
- Cc: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>, Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>, MMVagnoni@mdanderson.org, James Malone <malone@ebi.ac.uk>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:15 PM, M. Scott Marshall
<mscottmarshall@gmail.com> wrote:
> The main reason is that when semantics and natural language are
> inserted into identifiers, some identifers are doomed to become stale
> as thinking evolves or changes about the semantic representation.
Doesn't the definition itself grow stale?
> Shouldn't we consider RDF to be the bytecode of knowledge?
Then what is the source code, and the compiler?
Take care
Oliver
--
Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
Systems Biology Linker at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/sybil)
Turning Knowledge Data into Models
Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 21:58:45 UTC