On Monday, June 20, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: Hi, > sorry to jump on this thread like this... > > To be honest, I'm kind of concerned by the insistence on semantic-opaque > identifiers. I am as well and I have been for some time. > I understand the reason for them, > Actually, I would be interested in hearing the reason for them enumerated, because I have had a hard time imagining what could possibly offset the (significant) impact on readability that it has on biomedical ontologies. The barrier is already high for non-logicians and non-semantic web aficionados to use biomedical ontologies. Why set it any higher? -- Chime > >
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 19:35:08 UTC