- From: mdmiller <mdmiller53@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 10:47:00 -0700
- To: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- Cc: "HCLS" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
hi kei, > Just want to clarify that what I meant was that it might be beyond the > scope of our use case to accurately, comprehensively, and precisely define > what gene expression really mean given the degree of complexity involved. exactly, i believe we can trust the authors of the gene expression papers and the journals themselves for this cheers, michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu> To: "mdmiller" <mdmiller53@comcast.net> Cc: "HCLS" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:23 AM Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon > Hi Michael, > > mdmiller wrote: >> hi kei, >> >>> What do we mean by differentially expressed genes? One definition is >>> that differentially expressed genes are genes with significantly >>> different expression in two samples/conditions/experimental >>> factors/dimensions (e.g., treated vs. untreated, disease vs, normal, >>> time point1 vs. time point 2) of microarray experiments. >> >> yes, this was my meaning. >> >> this is to differentiate between a gene that is always expressed under >> normal conditions because it is part of an essential pathway that is >> always running, that gene is only interesting if its expression level >> changes--similarly for a normally unexpressed gene. > > Thanks for confirming. A consensus definition (even it's broad) is > important to our gene list representation. There are a variety of methods > (e.g., statistical tests) that can be used to identify a list of > differentially expressed genes in two different groups. That's Scott's > point about the importance of capturing as part of the genelist context > what methods have been used for detecting differentially expressed genes. > I hope the use case can help convince the community the need/use of a > common vocabulary for describing such methods. >> >>> How to measure or infer gene expression (e.g., from mRNA) is a whole >>> complex question that may be beyond the scope of our use case. >> >> yes, which i think was scott's point in his reply. in fact, for the >> BioRDF use case, initially at least, it is probably sufficient that the >> authors of the paper state that a gene is part of the significant gene >> list. > Just want to clarify that what I meant was that it might be beyond the > scope of our use case to accurately, comprehensively, and precisely define > what gene expression really mean given the degree of complexity involved. > > Cheers, > > -Kei >> >> cheers, >> michael >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >> To: "mdmiller" <mdmiller53@comcast.net> >> Cc: "M. Scott Marshall" <marshall@science.uva.nl>; "HCLS" >> <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 8:52 PM >> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >> >> >>> Hi Michael et al, >>> >>> What do we mean by differentially expressed genes? One definition is >>> that differentially expressed genes are genes with significantly >>> different expression in two samples/conditions/experimental >>> factors/dimensions (e.g., treated vs. untreated, disease vs, normal, >>> time point1 vs. time point 2) of microarray experiments. >>> >>> How to measure or infer gene expression (e.g., from mRNA) is a whole >>> complex question that may be beyond the scope of our use case. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Kei >>> >>> mdmiller wrote: >>> >>>> hi scott, >>>> >>>> i think you, jim and lena are doing a great job moving the technical >>>> aspect of this work forward. i'm looking forward to seeing the end >>>> results. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> michael >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Scott Marshall" >>>> <marshall@science.uva.nl> >>>> To: "mdmiller" <mdmiller53@comcast.net> >>>> Cc: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>; "HCLS" >>>> <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:21 AM >>>> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the clarification. I also explained those concepts during >>>>> the BioRDF teleconference but it is difficult for the scribe to >>>>> capture such details accurately from a phone conversation. Just >>>>> knowing that a gene has changed (either up or down) already gives us >>>>> something to work with. Since we started with the microarray use case, >>>>> we have aimed to focus on the list of differentially expressed genes >>>>> as our entry point into related molecular information, phenotypes, >>>>> pathways, diseases, etc. >>>>> >>>>> In addition to the gene list and experimental factors, there is some >>>>> data provenance information that characterizes the origins of the gene >>>>> list, such as the type of significant analysis or technique that was >>>>> performed (ANOVA, LIMMA, ..) and p-value cutoff for the list discussed >>>>> in the associated article(s), software packages used (specific R >>>>> package from BioConductor, GeneSpring, NextBio, ..). It would be handy >>>>> if there was a common vocabulary for this type of information (URI's >>>>> for statistical techniques and software packages). I think that some >>>>> related resources have been described by myGrid/myExperiment. However, >>>>> lacking a complete vocabulary, it is still possible to make use of the >>>>> gene list without such a fine grained description of its provenance. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Scott >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:35 AM, mdmiller <mdmiller53@comcast.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> sorry i ended up not being able to make the call. >>>>>> >>>>>> "P value >>>>>> The probability (ranging from zero to one) that the results observed >>>>>> in a >>>>>> study could have occurred by chance if the null hypothesis was true. >>>>>> A P >>>>>> value of ? 0.05 is often used as a threshold to indicate statistical >>>>>> significance." (1) >>>>>> >>>>>> the exact meaning of p-value depends on what is being measured. >>>>>> >>>>>> also, sometimes it isn't so important that a gene is up or down >>>>>> regulated >>>>>> but whether its expression changes from up or down regulated over the >>>>>> experimental factors, e.g. if you increase the dose of the drug do >>>>>> the >>>>>> target genes go from non-expressed to up regulated. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> michael >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) >>>>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=antiepi&part=appendixes.app2 >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >>>>>> To: "HCLS" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:40 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Today's minutes are available at: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://esw.w3.org/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2010/05-24_Conference_Call >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks to Matthias for scribing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Kei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mdmiller wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> hi kei, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> look forward to joining the call, >>>>>>>> michael >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" >>>>>>>> <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >>>>>>>> To: "mdmiller" <mdmiller53@comcast.net>; "HCLS" >>>>>>>> <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 12:10 PM >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, May 24 was what I meant. It was a typo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Kei >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mdmiller wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> hi kei, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> do you mean monday (may 24)? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>> michael >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" >>>>>>>>>> <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >>>>>>>>>> To: "JunZhao" <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> >>>>>>>>>> Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 2:28 PM >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Since there were only Jun and Scott who attended the last BioRDF >>>>>>>>>>> call >>>>>>>>>>> (I was not able to attend due to some emergency meetings), we >>>>>>>>>>> decided to >>>>>>>>>>> have the next BioRDF call on the coming Monday (May 21) at 11 am >>>>>>>>>>> (EDT). The >>>>>>>>>>> agenda will be the same (see below). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Kei >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> JunZhao wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is a reminder that the next BioRDF telcon call will be >>>>>>>>>>>> held at >>>>>>>>>>>> 11 >>>>>>>>>>>> am EDT (4 pm CET) on Monday, May 17 (see details below). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Jun >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> == Conference Details == >>>>>>>>>>>> * Date of Call: Monday, May 17, 2010 >>>>>>>>>>>> * Time of Call: 11:00 am Eastern Time (4 pm CET) >>>>>>>>>>>> * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) >>>>>>>>>>>> * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) >>>>>>>>>>>> * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) >>>>>>>>>>>> * Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS") >>>>>>>>>>>> * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #HCLS (see W3C IRC >>>>>>>>>>>> page >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> details, or see Web IRC), Quick Start: Use >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.mibbit.com/chat/?server=irc.w3.org:6665&channel=%23hcls >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> IRC access. >>>>>>>>>>>> * Duration: ~1 hour >>>>>>>>>>>> * Frequency: bi-weekly >>>>>>>>>>>> * Convener: Jun >>>>>>>>>>>> * Scribe: to-be-determined >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ==Agenda== >>>>>>>>>>>> * Introduction >>>>>>>>>>>> * Gene list RDF representation >>>>>>>>>>>> * iPhone demo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 17:47:31 UTC