- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:30:24 +1000
- To: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- Cc: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>, public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
2009/5/6 Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>: > Matthias Samwald wrote: > >> I have also started to convert SIDER into aTags, but our two conversions >> will be complementary. What I am doing is mapping the information to the OBO >> disease ontology and to DBpedia (for drug names), and reusing OBO and >> DBpedia URIs directly. The conversion will be lossy when no matches are >> found in these resources, but it will be bound more tightly to OBO and >> DBpedia. >> >> The STITCH ids for chemicals seem to be equivalent to Pubchem in all cases >> I checked. Are there deviations? > > I wonder if there are any cross-references between STITCH and the TCM > dataset that Jun converted. > > -Kei > According to the TCM front page there is a news story that includes a reference to STITCH so I was going to go through the TCM data and see whether the link exists in RDF. Cheers, Peter
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 05:30:59 UTC