- From: Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:41:26 -0400
- To: "Chris Mungall" <cjm@berkeleybop.org>
- Cc: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>, "W3C HCLSIG hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "Matthias Samwald" <samwald@gmx.at>
I found it with the EBI's OLS service http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/ oh, I was going to ask - what tool should we use for obo2owl nowadays? -=Michel=- > -----Original Message----- > From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb- > lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chris Mungall > Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 4:35 PM > To: Michel_Dumontier > Cc: Kei Cheung; W3C HCLSIG hcls; Matthias Samwald > Subject: Re: blog: semantic dissonance in uniprot > > > On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:33 AM, Michel_Dumontier wrote: > > > The Gene Ontology says a Protein (GO:0003675) is a Thing (the entity > > was removed, but then later added so the identifier wouldn't be > > reused) > > More accurately: very early versions of the GO had a term named > "protein", but this was obsoleted because it was out of scope for the > GO. The term was obsoleted, but a historic record is maintained. GO > does not intend to say "protein is_a thing", what you are seeing is > probably an artefact of the translation of obsoletion metadata to OWL.
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 20:43:50 UTC