W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2009

RE: blog: semantic dissonance in uniprot

From: Colin Batchelor <BatchelorC@rsc.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:49:04 +0000
To: "'marshall@science.uva.nl'" <marshall@science.uva.nl>, W3C HCLSIG hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6C381FB101CF4540A47EA1D49E827D4E2B3391B191@topaz.rsc-network.org>
M. Scott Marshall writes:

> The blog is from Benjamin Good (from Mark Wilkinson's Lab) and was
> referenced during a napkin discussion I had with Marco Roos and Ben
> about how one could best refer to a protein in text-mined triples.

Species disambiguation in text mining is harder than one might think.  A project that looks useful in this regard is Uniprot's younger sibling PRO (http://pir.georgetown.edu/pro/), which is being compiled at the Protein Information Resource at Georgetown and provides a species-independent backoff for when you don't know where your smad or rigor mortis came from.

Best wishes,


This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 18:02:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:41 UTC