- From: Helen Parkinson <parkinson@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:55:27 +0100
- To: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- CC: HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, James Malone <malone@ebi.ac.uk>
Responses in line. >> >> >> 1. We have text mined much of the Affymetrix GEO data, curated it and >> imported it into ArrayExpress - there is now much better sample >> annotation than the native data in GEO. We also are running QC across >> all the data files so we know which should be excluded for future >> analyses. > I think it's the right thing to do both to enrich data annotation and > to enhance data quality. This will help data integration a lot. >> > Currently, we are exploring query federation in the neuroscience > context. It'd be great if we can use the neuroscience use case(s) to > help drive your ontology development for text mining and data > visualization. In addition to the NIH neuroscience microarray > consortium, it may be possible to collaborate with the Neuroscience > Information Framework (NIF) to see if we can utilize some of its > resources (e.g., neuron ontology). Re-use of the neuron ontology is possible, but it depends on whether there is available data to annotate either in ArrayExpress or GEO. If you can get me a list of experiments accessions or pubmed ids I can see if this is feasible > >> >> 3. We have summary level data of genes x conditions for ~30,000 hybs >> worth of data in our gene expression atlas with p values indicating >> relative under/over-expression. We are planning to export these as >> triples as soon as we publish the atlas - these may be of interest. >> www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa - there's an API at present, but it will be >> improved in the next month or so. > It fits well with what we're currently exploring in terms of gene list > representation and linking genes and samples to existing ontologies. > It'd be great if we can download or fetch RDF triples from EBI atlas. We have a student starting work on this in a month, if you can produce concrete use cases for how you want to access these data we can do something. >> >> 4. If neuroscience data is of specific interest we could do a themed >> atlas release where we add datasets for a given community or project >> and make these available. These can be identified by ArrayExpress or >> GEO accession or pubmed and we can re-annotate the genes vs >> Uniprot/Ensembl, add GO terms, etc and curate the sample attributes >> and experimental variables. These pipelines are already in place as >> part of our production workflow. > > I think it's a great idea to do a themed atlas (e.g., neuro-atlas). I > just played with gxa a little bit. It's nice! For example, I could > find genes that are over-expressed in the hippocampus brain region > across different experiments. However, when I tried to do the same > thing for neurons, there are only a few neuron types that I can > select. It'd be nice if we can have more neuron types, for instance. This is probably as we don't have data - here's a list of human experiments with the term neuron - if any of these are useful, then I can prioritise their curation and inclusion in an atlas release http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray-as/ae/browse.html?keywords=neuron&species=Homo+sapiens&array=&exptype=&pagesize=25&sortby=releasedate&sortorder=descending and brain http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray-as/ae/browse.html?keywords=brain&species=Homo+sapiens&array=&exptype=&pagesize=25&sortby=releasedate&sortorder=descending >> >> I'd be very happy to collaborate, and for this group to use our data, >> we spend a lot of time adding semantic value to it, so please let me >> know if this is of interest > We are also looking into the possibility of establishing collaboration > with the scientific discourse task force based on the microarray use > case. We're planning to have a microarray-related presentation and > discussion on Aug. 31 (Monday, 11 am EDT/5 pm CET). Details will be > announced later. It'd be great if you can join the BioRDF call to > participate in the discussion. > > Cheers, > > -Kei >> >> best regards >> >> Helen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Kei Cheung wrote: >>> The minutes for yesterday's BioRDF call are available at: >>> >>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2009-07-20_Conference_Call >>> >>> >>> Thanks to Lena for scribing and Eric for retrieving the transcript >>> from the IRC log. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Kei >>> >>> Kei Cheung wrote: >>>> This is a reminder that the next BioRDF teleconf. will be held at >>>> 11 am EDT (5 pm CET) on Monday, July 20 (see details below). >>>> >>>> I created the following wiki page for discussing the microarray use >>>> case: >>>> >>>> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/QueryFederation2 >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> -Kei >>>> >>>> == Conference Details == >>>> * Date of Call: Monday July 20, 2009 >>>> * Time of Call: 11:00 am Eastern Time >>>> * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) >>>> * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) >>>> * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) >>>> * Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS") >>>> * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #hcls (see >>>> [http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/ W3C IRC page] for details, or see >>>> [http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi Web IRC]) >>>> * Duration: ~1 hour >>>> * Frequency: bi-weekly >>>> * Convener: Kei Cheung >>>> >>>> == Agenda == >>>> * Roll call and introduction (Kei) >>>> * TCM data quick update (Jun, Kei) >>>> * Query federation use case expanison (microarray) (All) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Helen Parkinson, PhD ArrayExpress Production Coordinator, Microarray Informatics Team, EBI EBI 01223 494672 Skype: helen.parkinson.ebi
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 09:56:15 UTC