- From: Susanna-Assunta Sansone <sansone@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:43:04 +0000
- To: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- CC: mdmiller <mdmiller53@comcast.net>, Jim McCusker <james.mccusker@yale.edu>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Philippe Rocca-Serra <rocca@ebi.ac.uk>
Hi Kei, correct, and just to clarify this > ...if people are doing micorarray experiments only, MAGE-TAB and ISA-TAB are essentially the same. meaning that both can be used as fullfil the same reporting needs, but their syntax is different. Regards, Susanna Kei Cheung wrote: > Hi Susanna, > > Thanks for the information. If I understand it correctly, ISA-TAB can > be used for different types of experiments (e.g., microarray, deep > sequencing, and mass spectrometry), while MAGE-TAB is designed for > microarray experiments only. However, if people are doing micorarray > experiments only, MAGE-TAB and ISA-TAB are essentially the same. I may > have missed something. > > Best, > > -Kei > > Susanna Sansone wrote: >> Hi Kei, >> > isa-tab (how does this differ from mage-tab?) >> ISA-Tab is a superset of MAGE-Tab and serves to report multi-omics >> (and in general, multi-assays) studies. Please, see: >> http://isatab.sf.net and details in the ISA-Tab specification. >> Regards, >> Susanna >> >
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 00:43:52 UTC