- From: Ward Blondé <wablo@psb.ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:10:28 +0100
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
- CC: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
Hello, There were still some questions about BioGateway (http://www.semantic-systems-biology.org/) that emerged during the F2F meeting, but couldn't be discussed fully as the schedule was very tight. The key question was whether BioGateway is compatible with the HCLS initiatives, and BioRDF in particular. That is not so clear, mainly because of the URIs. Which RDF did we use? We made our own RDF-translations trough Onto-Perl (http://search.cpan.org/~easr/ONTO-PERL-1.13/), an in-house programming library, to have optimal queryability and integration of all the imported resources. Everything is fully automatic from downloading the original sources, to loading the created RDF into Virtuoso. Why didn't we use existing OWL files, to use its RDF syntax? We found out that SPARQL gave us the best results for querying. As Onto-Perl allows RDF-exports, we could optimize the RDF to get less verbose queries and quicker answers. The RDF syntax of OWL contains a sort of mini-graphs between related classes. That makes it a heavy burden for SPARQL querying, although SPARQL can not exploit this for reasoning purposes. About the URIs: We created our own URIs, because it was not clear to us which URIs should be preferred for usage. And also because that made it easy during the development, and realized too late how important this is. We think that common URIs is very important to make the Semantic Web work. Just like common tools and formats, we need common URIs! This is not crucial for http-URIs for web browsing by human, because a redirect to a synonymous URI will cost only a small fraction of the time, and web developers can maintain the redirects manually. But this is completely different for query systems and reasoning systems that have to do complex operations on millions of such URIs in a very short time. Large synonym lists might solve this problem technically, but should be avoided if possible, I think. regards, Ward Matthias Samwald wrote: > Are the minutes from our F2F meeting [1] last week in Mandelieu > already online? I can only find some fragments, but not all of them. > > Thanks, > Matthias Samwald > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/F2F/2008-10_F2F -- ================================================================== Ward Blondé wablo@psb.ugent.be PhD student Tel:+32 (0)9 331 38 24 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM http://www.psb.ugent.be/cbd/people_ward_blonde.php ==================================================================
Received on Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:11:00 UTC