- From: Mark Wilkinson <markw@illuminae.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:48:44 -0700
- To: "eric neumann" <ekneumann@gmail.com>, "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
I can't help but see a lot of LSID-precedent wisdom in these "Active PURLS"... ;-) 8-) Mark On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:36:48 -0700, eric neumann <ekneumann@gmail.com> wrote: > While attending Semtech 2008 I was impressed with a number of > interesting SW > talks. One in particular is worth mentioning to the HCLSIG community > regarding the roadmap to semanticizing data from authoritative sources. > This > applies to data from sources such as NCBI and EBI (Uniprot has taken the > lead to help make this happen-- thank you!). In the URI note [1], for > instance, one possible idea is to use purl URIs to reference > data/metadata > from NCBI that has been converted into RDF. > Even though PURLs offer re-direction (even when NCBI finally publishes > its > own RDF), the URI would remain as purl.org/../ncbi/entrez-23111. Some of > us > find this troubling, since most users of such data would expect the URI > to > state clearly it comes from http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov or > http://ebi.ac.uk/. Some of you know this has been a long (and > difficult) discussion, and we > still have no clear proposal of how to do this. And here is where we have > lost momentum-- no clear path forward that most of us would be happy > with... > Enter Active Purls: In Eric Miller's SemTech session on "PURLZ", he > described a new model for PURLs coming out this summer called Active > PURLs. > These PURLS are associated with services that are defined the source. I > asked him about one specific service: if one starts with a PURL URI to > Entrez data converted to RDF by (let's say) the HCLS community, can one > include a service to say that if NCBI now has created its own RDF Entrez > version with URI, that the PURL should be permanently re-directed to the > NCBI location? In other words, can one ask a bunch of PURLs "what are > your > direct, and permanent URIs to the authoritative source?" Eric's reply > seems > to suggest this is quite easy to set up.. > > SO what is gained? Well if you have a large KB with lots of > purl.org//ncbi/... > records, there would be now a mechanism to replace all these wholesale to > the new NCBI URIs. In other words, a global replace of older initial > PURLs > to proper URIs from authoritative spaces. This seems to make a lot of > life > science folks asking how to begin working with SW and URIs happy-- a > clean > and basic transition model can be offered to the community for getting > started with SW via Active PURLS. > > I would like to propose we plan to include this as a topic for the next > HCLS > TC in the coming weeks. Perhaps we can even ask Eric M to speak about > this, > and see if this indeed can help our efforts move forwards! > > cheers, > Eric > > > 1 - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/notes/uris/ -- Mark D Wilkinson, PI Bioinformatics Assistant Professor, Medical Genetics The James Hogg iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research Providence Heart + Lung Institute University of British Columbia - St. Paul's Hospital Vancouver, BC, Canada
Received on Friday, 30 May 2008 15:50:47 UTC